public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition
@ 2002-11-04  0:47 Chris Friesen
  2002-11-04  3:19 ` IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition -- partially recovered Chris Friesen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Friesen @ 2002-11-04  0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel


duron, kt133 motherboard, ide disks, new clean mandrake 9 install with 
ext3, running fine over several boots

Yesterday I compiled 2.5.45 after working around some build glitches, 
booted fine and ran it for several hours.  I just turned on your basic 
generic IDE stuff and the VIA ide controllers, nothing fancy or (at 
least so I thought) dangerous.

Today I booted but it wouldn't let me log in as normal user (error 
message flashed too quickly for me to be able to read it, looked like it 
began with "critical") but I could log in as root so I did.  I poked 
around and didn't see anything odd, so I went to reboot onto the 
mandrake kernel.

I boot up, and it gets to the point where it checks the root filesystem 
and it halts with an error:

Checking root filesystem
fsck.ext3/dev/hdb9:
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock 
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
      e2fsck -b 8193 <device>

: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hdb9
Failed to check filesystem.  Do you want to repair the errors? (Y/N)
(beware, you can lose data)


A bit worried, I rebooted with the rescue disk and ran fsck.ext3, which 
found a bunch of errors that I told it to clean.  Still on my rescue 
kernel/ramdisk I mounted the filesystem and tried listing a few files 
and everything was fine.  I then rebooted and the boot-time fsck gave me 
the same error as above.

I thought that 2.5.45 wasn't supposed to have ide problems like this 
anymore...

Anyways, the only thing left that I can see is to re-install--anyone 
else have a better idea?  I'll hold off on doing that for a few days in 
case someone wants more information on the system.

Any ideas why the rescue fsck passes but boot-time fails?

Thanks,

Chris


-- 
Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition -- partially recovered
  2002-11-04  0:47 IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition Chris Friesen
@ 2002-11-04  3:19 ` Chris Friesen
  2002-11-04  9:48   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Friesen @ 2002-11-04  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Well, it turns out that the reason I couldn't boot was a conflict 
between the boot time checks and devfs (with devfs on /dev/hdb9 didn't 
exist...).  If I turned off devfs loading at boot everything went okay.

However, there *were* those problems that fsck.ext3 found and I'm still 
kind of suspicious about them.


Chris


-- 
Chris Friesen                    | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks                  | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue              | fax:  (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada        | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition -- partially recovered
  2002-11-04  3:19 ` IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition -- partially recovered Chris Friesen
@ 2002-11-04  9:48   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2002-11-04  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Friesen; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Sun, Nov 03 2002, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Well, it turns out that the reason I couldn't boot was a conflict 
> between the boot time checks and devfs (with devfs on /dev/hdb9 didn't 
> exist...).  If I turned off devfs loading at boot everything went okay.
> 
> However, there *were* those problems that fsck.ext3 found and I'm still 
> kind of suspicious about them.

Be sure not to tell us what hard drive you have, if you used dma or not,
etc. These kinds of clues might help us understand what the problem is.

Usually, a boot log at the least is needed.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-04  9:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-04  0:47 IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition Chris Friesen
2002-11-04  3:19 ` IDE BUG REPORT: 2.5.45 killed my / partition -- partially recovered Chris Friesen
2002-11-04  9:48   ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox