From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@pyxtechnologies.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
ptb@it.uc3m.es, Justin Cormack <justin@street-vision.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ENBD for 2.5.64
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:58:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E81B212.40101@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10303252222060.25072-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Andre Hedrick wrote:
> We have almost finalized our initiator to be submitted under OSL/GPL.
> This will be a full RFC ERL=2 w/ Sync-n-Steering.
That's pretty good news.
Also, I tangent and mention that I have been won over WRT OSL: with its
more tight "lawyerspeak" and mutual patent defense clauses, I consider
OSL to be a "better GPL" license.
I would in fact love to see the Linux kernel relicensed under OSL. I
think that would close some "holes" that exist with the GPL, and give us
a better legal standing. But relicensing the kernel would be huge
political undertaking, and I sure as hell don't have the energy, even if
it possible. No idea if Linus, Alan, Andrew, or any of the other major
contributors would go for it, either.
Jeff, the radical
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-26 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1048623613.25914.14.camel@lotte>
2003-03-25 20:53 ` [PATCH] ENBD for 2.5.64 Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-26 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-26 5:55 ` Matt Mackall
2003-03-26 6:31 ` Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-26 6:48 ` Matt Mackall
2003-03-26 7:05 ` Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-26 6:59 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-03-26 13:58 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-03-26 7:31 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-03-26 9:59 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-03-26 10:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-26 13:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-26 16:09 ` Matt Mackall
[not found] ` <5.1.0.14.2.20030327085031.04aa7128@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com>
2003-03-26 22:40 ` Matt Mackall
2003-03-28 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-30 20:48 ` Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-26 22:16 Lincoln Dale
2003-03-26 22:56 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-03-26 23:21 ` Lincoln Dale
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-26 22:16 Lincoln Dale
2003-03-26 22:32 ` Andre Hedrick
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10303261422580.25072-100000@master.linux-ide .org>
2003-03-26 23:03 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-03-26 23:39 ` Andre Hedrick
[not found] <5.1.0.14.2.20030327083757.037c0760@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com>
2003-03-26 22:02 ` Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-26 23:49 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-03-27 0:08 ` Peter T. Breuer
2003-03-25 17:27 Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E81B212.40101@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=andre@pyxtechnologies.com \
--cc=justin@street-vision.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox