* [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs
@ 2003-04-08 16:31 David Ford
2003-04-07 23:17 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Ford @ 2003-04-08 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Trond Myklebust, Neil Brown,
Oleg Drokin, Hans Reiser
1. Power loss this morning
2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010202
EIP is at 0x0
eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000006 ecx: c03efb28 edx: c827be94
esi: c83ad014 edi: dfd16e00 ebp: c827beac esp: c827be70
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1188, threadinfo=c827a000 task=df3c2740)
Stack: c01ce6b8 dfd16e00 c827bea0 c827be94 c01ad070 dfff04f4 00000006
c83ad004
11270000 00000e07 000008dd 0000004d 0002f4f2 00000e07 01214b98
c827bef4
c01ad4c7 dfd16e00 c83ad014 00000006 00000006 c01ad070 dfff04f4
c83ad004
Call Trace:
[<c01ce6b8>] reiserfs_decode_fh+0xb4/0xc0
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ad4c7>] fh_verify+0x343/0x4f8
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ae694>] nfsd_access+0x28/0xf4
[<c01b4ec9>] nfsd3_proc_access+0xc1/0xd0
[<c01ab4a3>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc3/0x18f
[<c033b5cd>] svc_process+0x3ed/0x67a
[<c01ab200>] nfsd+0x23c/0x41c
[<c01aafc4>] nfsd+0x0/0x41c
[<c0107145>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
Code: Bad EIP value.
<1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000000
printing eip:
00000000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 1
EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010202
EIP is at 0x0
eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000006 ecx: c03efb28 edx: c8269e94
esi: c83a0014 edi: dfd16e00 ebp: c8269eac esp: c8269e70
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 1189, threadinfo=c8268000 task=df5ba720)
Stack: c01ce6b8 dfd16e00 c8269ea0 c8269e94 c01ad070 dfff04f4 00000006
c83a0004
11270000 00000e07 000008dd 0000004d 0002f4f2 00000e07 01214b98
c8269ef4
c01ad4c7 dfd16e00 c83a0014 00000006 00000006 c01ad070 dfff04f4
c83a0004
Call Trace:
[<c01ce6b8>] reiserfs_decode_fh+0xb4/0xc0
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ad4c7>] fh_verify+0x343/0x4f8
[<c01ad070>] nfsd_acceptable+0x0/0x114
[<c01ae694>] nfsd_access+0x28/0xf4
[<c01b4ec9>] nfsd3_proc_access+0xc1/0xd0
[<c01ab4a3>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc3/0x18f
[<c033b5cd>] svc_process+0x3ed/0x67a
[<c01ab200>] nfsd+0x23c/0x41c
[<c01aafc4>] nfsd+0x0/0x41c
[<c0107145>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
(repeats several times)
Server is now useless and needs to be rebooted. I've shutdown my NFS
clients in order to run the server minimally, it's a mail/web server.
Assistance would be appreciated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs
2003-04-08 16:31 [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs David Ford
@ 2003-04-07 23:17 ` Neil Brown
2003-04-08 21:47 ` David Ford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2003-04-07 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ford
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Trond Myklebust, Oleg Drokin,
Hans Reiser
On Tuesday April 8, david+powerix@blue-labs.org wrote:
> 1. Power loss this morning
> 2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
> 3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> printing eip:
> 00000000
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] Not tainted
Development kernels are like that....
This is a bug in the kernel which is triggered by using nfs-utils
1.0.3
Either upgrade to the latest 2.5 kernel, or downgrade nfs-utils until
you can upgrade the kernel.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs
2003-04-07 23:17 ` Neil Brown
@ 2003-04-08 21:47 ` David Ford
2003-04-08 3:38 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Ford @ 2003-04-08 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Trond Myklebust, Oleg Drokin,
Hans Reiser
The latest 2.5 kernel being .67?
Yes, dev kernels are like that... but I'm not going to get into my
angst over 'release' kernels and NFS ;)
david
Neil Brown wrote:
>On Tuesday April 8, david+powerix@blue-labs.org wrote:
>
>
>>1. Power loss this morning
>>2. Fixed filesystems (reiserfstools is fscking useless on root filesystems)
>>3. Now server OOPSes when nfs client tries to stat/read files/dirs
>>
>>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
>> printing eip:
>>00000000
>>*pde = 00000000
>>Oops: 0000
>>CPU: 0
>>EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] Not tainted
>>
>>
>
>Development kernels are like that....
>
> This is a bug in the kernel which is triggered by using nfs-utils
> 1.0.3
>
> Either upgrade to the latest 2.5 kernel, or downgrade nfs-utils until
> you can upgrade the kernel.
>
>NeilBrown
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs
2003-04-08 21:47 ` David Ford
@ 2003-04-08 3:38 ` Neil Brown
2003-04-08 3:44 ` David Ford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2003-04-08 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ford
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Trond Myklebust, Oleg Drokin,
Hans Reiser
On Tuesday April 8, david+powerix@blue-labs.org wrote:
> The latest 2.5 kernel being .67?
Yep, .67 is recent enough.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs
2003-04-08 3:38 ` Neil Brown
@ 2003-04-08 3:44 ` David Ford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Ford @ 2003-04-08 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Trond Myklebust, Oleg Drokin,
Hans Reiser
Yes, it's fixed.
Thank you,
david
Neil Brown wrote:
>On Tuesday April 8, david+powerix@blue-labs.org wrote:
>
>
>>The latest 2.5 kernel being .67?
>>
>>
>
>Yep, .67 is recent enough.
>
>NeilBrown
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-08 3:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-08 16:31 [OOPS] 100% repeatable OOPS, 2.5.61-66, NFS and reiserfs David Ford
2003-04-07 23:17 ` Neil Brown
2003-04-08 21:47 ` David Ford
2003-04-08 3:38 ` Neil Brown
2003-04-08 3:44 ` David Ford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox