From: Kevin Radloff <radsaq@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Logic bug in 2.6.12 conservative cpufreq governor?
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:25:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b0ffc1f05061811251c12718f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
The conservative cpufreq governor's "ignore_nice" sysfs parameter is
reversed from what I would expect:
% cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/ignore_nice
1
.. While it's not ignoring nice'd processes. Changing it to 0 causes
it to ignore them. That would seem to make sense only if it's supposed
to mean "ignore niceness of processes" vs "ignore nice'd processes"...
Is that so?
If it is, then wouldn't the name make more sense as "ignore_niceness"
or something equally less ambiguous? :)
Please CC me as I'm not on the list.
--
Kevin 'radsaq' Radloff
radsaq@gmail.com
http://saqataq.us/
reply other threads:[~2005-06-18 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b0ffc1f05061811251c12718f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=radsaq@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox