* Logic bug in 2.6.12 conservative cpufreq governor?
@ 2005-06-18 18:25 Kevin Radloff
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kevin Radloff @ 2005-06-18 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
The conservative cpufreq governor's "ignore_nice" sysfs parameter is
reversed from what I would expect:
% cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative/ignore_nice
1
.. While it's not ignoring nice'd processes. Changing it to 0 causes
it to ignore them. That would seem to make sense only if it's supposed
to mean "ignore niceness of processes" vs "ignore nice'd processes"...
Is that so?
If it is, then wouldn't the name make more sense as "ignore_niceness"
or something equally less ambiguous? :)
Please CC me as I'm not on the list.
--
Kevin 'radsaq' Radloff
radsaq@gmail.com
http://saqataq.us/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-06-18 18:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-18 18:25 Logic bug in 2.6.12 conservative cpufreq governor? Kevin Radloff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox