From: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, kurt@garloff.de,
Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - AGP bus/phys cleanups
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:05:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4238D7E2.2060002@tupshin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16952.53719.150647.638710@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras wrote:
>Rik van Riel writes:
>
>
>
>>Thing is, the rest of the kernel uses virt_to_phys for
>>two different things. Only one of them has to do with
>>the real physical address, the other is about getting
>>the page frame number.
>>
>>
>
>So fix the places that are using virt_to_phys to get the page frame
>number to use virt_to_pfn instead. :)
>
>
>
>>On native x86, x86-64 and others, the page frame number
>>and physical address are directly related to each other.
>>Under Xen, however, the two are different - and the
>>AGPGART really needs to have the physical address ;)
>>
>>
>
>If Xen is letting the kernel program the GART, you just lost any
>memory isolation between partitions you might have been trying to
>enforce. :)
>
>
Since xen only lets the dom0 (privileged domain) program the GART, all
of the domU's (non-privileged domains) are still isolated from each other.
-Tupshin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-17 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-16 11:48 [PATCH] Xen/i386 cleanups - AGP bus/phys cleanups Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-16 14:58 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 15:01 ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-16 18:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-16 18:35 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 18:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-16 19:08 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 19:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-16 19:11 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-16 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-16 17:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-16 21:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-03-16 22:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-03-16 23:55 ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-17 0:39 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-03-17 1:05 ` Tupshin Harper [this message]
2005-03-17 3:44 ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-17 4:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-03-17 4:58 ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-17 9:16 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-17 9:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-03-17 10:56 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-19 10:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-19 10:56 ` Christian Limpach
2005-03-19 13:01 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-17 13:53 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-18 0:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-03-18 4:23 ` Rik van Riel
2005-03-18 9:05 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4238D7E2.2060002@tupshin.com \
--to=tupshin@tupshin.com \
--cc=Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=kurt@garloff.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox