* how to limit memory with 2.6.10 on ppc64 machine?
@ 2006-02-03 23:21 Christopher Friesen
2006-02-04 0:54 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Friesen @ 2006-02-03 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc64-dev, linux-kernel
I'm running 2.6.10 on a ppc64 machine with 4GB of memory.
We're debugging an issue and would like to try and see if disabling the
U3 DART makes the problem go away. Unfortunately, this particular blade
is unstable if not all the memory banks are populated.
After some frustration I looked at the code and realized that the "mem="
functionality is not supported for ppc64 on this particular kernel.
Can anyone give me some advice on the simplest way to limit this thing
to under 2GB of memory so that the DART is not allocated/used?
Does anyone know when support for "mem=" was added? I know it is there
in the current git version, but the "powerpc" consolidation means
everything is all different now.
Thanks,
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: how to limit memory with 2.6.10 on ppc64 machine?
2006-02-03 23:21 how to limit memory with 2.6.10 on ppc64 machine? Christopher Friesen
@ 2006-02-04 0:54 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2006-02-04 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc64-dev; +Cc: Christopher Friesen, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:21, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> I'm running 2.6.10 on a ppc64 machine with 4GB of memory.
>
> We're debugging an issue and would like to try and see if disabling the
> U3 DART makes the problem go away. Unfortunately, this particular blade
> is unstable if not all the memory banks are populated.
>
> After some frustration I looked at the code and realized that the "mem="
> functionality is not supported for ppc64 on this particular kernel.
>
> Can anyone give me some advice on the simplest way to limit this thing
> to under 2GB of memory so that the DART is not allocated/used?
>
> Does anyone know when support for "mem=" was added? I know it is there
> in the current git version, but the "powerpc" consolidation means
> everything is all different now.
From memory (harhar) the mem= support was merged in 2.6.11, so the original
patch should _probably_ apply on a vanilla 2.6.10 tree, try it:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc64/patch?id=724
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-04 0:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-03 23:21 how to limit memory with 2.6.10 on ppc64 machine? Christopher Friesen
2006-02-04 0:54 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox