public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	nagar@watson.ibm.com, jlan@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Taskstats fix the structure members alignment issue
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:29:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <462A0AA9.8000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070420121543.6a1a8426.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:13:41 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> We broke the the alignment of members of taskstats to the 8 byte boundary
>> with the CSA patches. In the current kernel, the taskstats structure is
>> not suitable for use by 32 bit applications in a 64 bit kernel.
>>
> 
> ugh, that was bad of us.

Yes :-)

> 
>> ...
>> The patch adds an __attribute__((aligned(8))) to the
>> taskstats structure members so that 32 bit applications using taskstats
>> can work with a 64 bit kernel.
> 
> But there might be 32-bit applications out there which are using the
> present wrong structure?
> 
> otoh, I assume that those applications would be using taskstats.h and would
> hence encounter this bug and we would have heard about it, is that correct?
> 

Yes, correct.

> otoh^2, 32-bit applications running under 32-bit kernels will presently be
> functioning correctly, and your change will require that those applications
> be recompiled, I think?
> 

Yes, correct. They would be broken with this fix. We could  bump up the
version TASKSTATS_VERSION to 4. Would you like a new patch the version
bumped up?

> 
> This patch looks like 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 material, but very carefully...

Yes, 2.6.20 and 2.6.21 sound correct.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-21 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-20 16:43 [PATCH -mm] Taskstats fix the structure members alignment issue Balbir Singh
2007-04-20 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-21 12:59   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-04-21 19:33     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  5:00       ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=462A0AA9.8000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox