From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@intel.com>,
"dvhart@infradead.org" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix io mem mapping size
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:15:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470f3875-99f1-1bd2-da36-733f8c34d5fa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcgXYpOjqqgGshfKb+gih+nQYq_AoMH1OVbPd4np6LZ8g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andy,
On 03/16/2017 01:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj
> <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj
>>> <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:32:53PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>>>> Mapping entire GCR mem region in this driver creates
>>>>> mem region request conflict in sub devices that depend
>>>>> on PMC. This creates driver probe failure in devices like
>>>>> iTC0_wdt and telemetry device.
>>>> iTCO_WDT driver needs to check the BIT4 (NO_REBOOT) of PMC_CFG register
>>>> (Offset: 0x1008) and this falls in GCR space.
>>> Are we talking about ACPI-enabled platform?
>> IIUC, you are referring to WDT enumerated by ACPI tables (WDAT, WDRT etc) ?
>>
>> On APL/BXT i think we pass the resource mapping to iTCO_WDT driver since
>> acpi_has_watchdog provides the required protection. For non ACPI-enabled
>> platforms we have this issue since iTCO_WDT driver anyway tries resource
>> mapping when the iTCO_version >=2.
> And driver with necessary stuff should be already in upstream.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/tree/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c?h=watchdog-next#n552
>
> Or it's not enough?
Can this driver replace intel_pmc_ipc driver ? It seems to be missing
IPC related APIs.
Regarding iTCO watchdog section, I think this driver also passes GCR
region as memory resource to iTCO_WDT device.
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Android kernel developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 3:32 [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix io mem mapping size Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2017-03-16 14:52 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-16 16:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-16 18:13 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-16 20:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-16 21:15 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy [this message]
2017-03-16 18:50 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-16 19:20 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-16 21:05 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix gcr offset Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2017-03-17 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Add pmc gcr read/write api's Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2017-03-17 11:26 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-17 17:11 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Fix PMC GCR memory mapping failure Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2017-03-17 11:43 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-17 13:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-03-17 14:05 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-17 14:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-17 17:37 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 18:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-17 18:50 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 17:24 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 17:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-03-17 18:39 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-17 17:15 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-03-20 2:52 ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-17 0:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: remove iTCO GCR mem resource Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2017-03-17 11:47 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-17 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: fix gcr offset Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-03-17 17:06 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470f3875-99f1-1bd2-da36-733f8c34d5fa@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
--cc=rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox