From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, milian.wolff@kdab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:28:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47669ba5-6f26-2842-e274-949411c5cb36@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484905166-10609-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
Any comments for this patch series?
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 1/20/2017 5:39 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
> v3: Iterate on RIPs of all callchain entries to check if the RIP is in
> inline functions.
>
> Reverse the order of the inliner printout if necessary.
>
> Provide new options "--inline-line" / "--inline-name" to print
> inline function name or print inline function source line.
>
> v2: Thanks so much for Arnaldo's comments!
> The modifications are:
>
> 1. Divide v1 patch "perf report: Find the inline stack for a
> given address" into 2 patches:
> a. perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> b. perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
>
> Some function names are changed:
> dso_name_get -> dso__name
> ilist_apend -> inline_list__append
> get_inline_node -> dso__parse_addr_inlines
> free_inline_node -> inline_node__delete
>
> 2. Since the function name are changed, update following patches
> accordingly.
> a. perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> b. perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
>
> 3. Rebase to latest perf/core branch. This patch is impacted.
> a. perf report: Create a new option "--inline"
>
> v1: Initial post
>
> It would be useful for perf to support a mode to query the
> inline stack for callgraph addresses. This would simplify
> finding the right code in code that does a lot of inlining.
>
> For example, the c code:
>
> static inline void f3(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 1000;) {
>
> if(i%2)
> i++;
> else
> i++;
> }
> printf("hello f3\n"); /* D */
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: f2 <- f1 > */
> static inline void f2(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> f3(); /* C */
> }
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: f1 <- main > */
> static inline void f1(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> f2(); /* B */
> }
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: main <- TOP > */
> int main()
> {
> struct timeval tv;
> time_t start, end;
>
> gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> start = end = tv.tv_sec;
> while((end - start) < 5) {
> f1(); /* A */
> gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> end = tv.tv_sec;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> The printed inline stack is:
>
> 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> |
> ---/home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:27 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:35 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:45 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:61 (inline)
>
> I tag A/B/C/D in above c code to indicate the source line,
> actually the inline stack is equal to:
>
> 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> |
> ---D
> C
> B
> A
>
> Jin Yao (5):
> perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
> perf report: Create new inline options
> perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
>
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 8 ++
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 +
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 75 +++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/hist.c | 5 +
> tools/perf/util/sort.h | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/srcline.c | 237 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 5 +
> tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 6 +-
> tools/perf/util/util.h | 16 +++
> 10 files changed, 489 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-20 9:39 [PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack Jin Yao
2017-01-20 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c Jin Yao
2017-01-20 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address Jin Yao
2017-01-20 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] perf report: Create new inline options Jin Yao
2017-01-20 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode Jin Yao
2017-01-20 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode Jin Yao
2017-02-21 0:28 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2017-03-02 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack Milian Wolff
2017-03-03 2:38 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47669ba5-6f26-2842-e274-949411c5cb36@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox