public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 3/4] ipc/sem.c: convert sem_array.sem_pending to struct list_head
@ 2008-05-24 11:26 Manfred Spraul
  2008-05-29 15:06 ` Nadia Derbey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Spraul @ 2008-05-24 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

sem_array.sem_pending is a double linked list, the attached
patch converts it to struct list_head.

Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
---
 include/linux/sem.h |   12 +++----
 ipc/sem.c           |   90 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sem.h b/include/linux/sem.h
index 87756ef..d425993 100644
--- a/include/linux/sem.h
+++ b/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -93,21 +93,19 @@ struct sem_array {
 	time_t			sem_otime;	/* last semop time */
 	time_t			sem_ctime;	/* last change time */
 	struct sem		*sem_base;	/* ptr to first semaphore in array */
-	struct sem_queue	*sem_pending;	/* pending operations to be processed */
-	struct sem_queue	**sem_pending_last; /* last pending operation */
+	struct list_head	sem_pending;	/* pending operations to be processed */
 	struct list_head	list_id;	/* undo requests on this array */
 	unsigned long		sem_nsems;	/* no. of semaphores in array */
 };
 
 /* One queue for each sleeping process in the system. */
 struct sem_queue {
-	struct sem_queue *	next;	 /* next entry in the queue */
-	struct sem_queue **	prev;	 /* previous entry in the queue, *(q->prev) == q */
-	struct task_struct*	sleeper; /* this process */
-	struct sem_undo *	undo;	 /* undo structure */
+	struct list_head	list;	 /* queue of pending operations */
+	struct task_struct	*sleeper; /* this process */
+	struct sem_undo		*undo;	 /* undo structure */
 	int    			pid;	 /* process id of requesting process */
 	int    			status;	 /* completion status of operation */
-	struct sembuf *		sops;	 /* array of pending operations */
+	struct sembuf		*sops;	 /* array of pending operations */
 	int			nsops;	 /* number of operations */
 	int			alter;   /* does the operation alter the array? */
 };
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 8cd96f1..38996c0 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -272,8 +272,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params)
 	ns->used_sems += nsems;
 
 	sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];
-	/* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */
-	sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->sem_pending);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->list_id);
 	sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
 	sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
@@ -331,38 +330,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semget(key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
 	return ipcget(ns, &sem_ids(ns), &sem_ops, &sem_params);
 }
 
-/* Manage the doubly linked list sma->sem_pending as a FIFO:
- * insert new queue elements at the tail sma->sem_pending_last.
- */
-static inline void append_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
-				    struct sem_queue * q)
-{
-	*(q->prev = sma->sem_pending_last) = q;
-	*(sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next) = NULL;
-}
-
-static inline void prepend_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
-				     struct sem_queue * q)
-{
-	q->next = sma->sem_pending;
-	*(q->prev = &sma->sem_pending) = q;
-	if (q->next)
-		q->next->prev = &q->next;
-	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &sma->sem_pending */
-		sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next;
-}
-
-static inline void remove_from_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
-				      struct sem_queue * q)
-{
-	*(q->prev) = q->next;
-	if (q->next)
-		q->next->prev = q->prev;
-	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &q->next */
-		sma->sem_pending_last = q->prev;
-	q->prev = NULL; /* mark as removed */
-}
-
 /*
  * Determine whether a sequence of semaphore operations would succeed
  * all at once. Return 0 if yes, 1 if need to sleep, else return error code.
@@ -438,16 +405,15 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
 	int error;
 	struct sem_queue * q;
 
-	q = sma->sem_pending;
-	while(q) {
+	q = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
+	while(&q->list != &sma->sem_pending) {
 		error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,
 					 q->undo, q->pid);
 
 		/* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */
 		if (error <= 0) {
 			struct sem_queue *n;
-			remove_from_queue(sma,q);
-			q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
+
 			/*
 			 * Continue scanning. The next operation
 			 * that must be checked depends on the type of the
@@ -458,11 +424,24 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
 			 *   for semaphore values to become 0.
 			 * - if the operation didn't modify the array,
 			 *   then just continue.
+			 * The order of list_del() and reading ->next
+			 * is crucial: In the former case, the list_del()
+			 * must be done first [because we might be the
+			 * first entry in ->sem_pending], in the latter
+			 * case the list_del() must be done last
+			 * [because the list is invalid after the list_del()]
 			 */
-			if (q->alter)
-				n = sma->sem_pending;
-			else
-				n = q->next;
+			if (q->alter) {
+				list_del(&q->list);
+				n = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
+			} else {
+				n = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue, list);
+				list_del(&q->list);
+			}
+
+			/* wake up the waiting thread */
+			q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
+
 			wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
 			/* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
 			 * writing q->status.
@@ -471,7 +450,7 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
 			q->status = error;
 			q = n;
 		} else {
-			q = q->next;
+			q = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue, list);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -491,7 +470,7 @@ static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
 	struct sem_queue * q;
 
 	semncnt = 0;
-	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
+	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
 		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
 		int nsops = q->nsops;
 		int i;
@@ -503,13 +482,14 @@ static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
 	}
 	return semncnt;
 }
+
 static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
 {
 	int semzcnt;
 	struct sem_queue * q;
 
 	semzcnt = 0;
-	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
+	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
 		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
 		int nsops = q->nsops;
 		int i;
@@ -529,7 +509,7 @@ static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
 static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
 {
 	struct sem_undo *un;
-	struct sem_queue *q;
+	struct sem_queue *q, *t;
 	struct sem_array *sma = container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
 
 	/* Invalidate the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.
@@ -541,17 +521,14 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
 		un->semid = -1;
 
 	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
-	q = sma->sem_pending;
-	while(q) {
-		struct sem_queue *n;
-		/* lazy remove_from_queue: we are killing the whole queue */
-		q->prev = NULL;
-		n = q->next;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(q, t, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
+		list_del(&q->list);
+
 		q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
 		wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */
 		smp_wmb();
 		q->status = -EIDRM;	/* hands-off q */
-		q = n;
 	}
 
 	/* Remove the semaphore set from the IDR */
@@ -1166,9 +1143,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
 	queue.pid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	queue.alter = alter;
 	if (alter)
-		append_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
+		list_add_tail(&queue.list, &sma->sem_pending);
 	else
-		prepend_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
+		list_add(&queue.list, &sma->sem_pending);
 
 	queue.status = -EINTR;
 	queue.sleeper = current;
@@ -1194,7 +1171,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
 
 	sma = sem_lock(ns, semid);
 	if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
-		BUG_ON(queue.prev != NULL);
 		error = -EIDRM;
 		goto out_free;
 	}
@@ -1212,7 +1188,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
 	 */
 	if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
 		error = -EAGAIN;
-	remove_from_queue(sma,&queue);
+	list_del(&queue.list);
 	goto out_unlock_free;
 
 out_unlock_free:
-- 
1.5.4.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/4] ipc/sem.c: convert sem_array.sem_pending to struct list_head
  2008-05-24 11:26 [PATCH 3/4] ipc/sem.c: convert sem_array.sem_pending to struct list_head Manfred Spraul
@ 2008-05-29 15:06 ` Nadia Derbey
  2008-06-07 14:52   ` Manfred Spraul
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nadia Derbey @ 2008-05-29 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manfred Spraul; +Cc: linux-kernel

Manfred Spraul wrote:
> sem_array.sem_pending is a double linked list, the attached
> patch converts it to struct list_head.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>

Reviewed-By: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>

2 small comments embedded.

> ---
>  include/linux/sem.h |   12 +++----
>  ipc/sem.c           |   90 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sem.h b/include/linux/sem.h
> index 87756ef..d425993 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sem.h
> @@ -93,21 +93,19 @@ struct sem_array {
>  	time_t			sem_otime;	/* last semop time */
>  	time_t			sem_ctime;	/* last change time */
>  	struct sem		*sem_base;	/* ptr to first semaphore in array */
> -	struct sem_queue	*sem_pending;	/* pending operations to be processed */
> -	struct sem_queue	**sem_pending_last; /* last pending operation */
> +	struct list_head	sem_pending;	/* pending operations to be processed */
>  	struct list_head	list_id;	/* undo requests on this array */
>  	unsigned long		sem_nsems;	/* no. of semaphores in array */
>  };
>  
>  /* One queue for each sleeping process in the system. */
>  struct sem_queue {
> -	struct sem_queue *	next;	 /* next entry in the queue */
> -	struct sem_queue **	prev;	 /* previous entry in the queue, *(q->prev) == q */
> -	struct task_struct*	sleeper; /* this process */
> -	struct sem_undo *	undo;	 /* undo structure */
> +	struct list_head	list;	 /* queue of pending operations */
> +	struct task_struct	*sleeper; /* this process */
> +	struct sem_undo		*undo;	 /* undo structure */
>  	int    			pid;	 /* process id of requesting process */
>  	int    			status;	 /* completion status of operation */
> -	struct sembuf *		sops;	 /* array of pending operations */
> +	struct sembuf		*sops;	 /* array of pending operations */
>  	int			nsops;	 /* number of operations */
>  	int			alter;   /* does the operation alter the array? */
>  };
> diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
> index 8cd96f1..38996c0 100644
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -272,8 +272,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params)
>  	ns->used_sems += nsems;
>  
>  	sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];
> -	/* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */
> -	sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->sem_pending);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sma->list_id);
>  	sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
>  	sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
> @@ -331,38 +330,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semget(key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
>  	return ipcget(ns, &sem_ids(ns), &sem_ops, &sem_params);
>  }
>  
> -/* Manage the doubly linked list sma->sem_pending as a FIFO:
> - * insert new queue elements at the tail sma->sem_pending_last.
> - */
> -static inline void append_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
> -				    struct sem_queue * q)
> -{
> -	*(q->prev = sma->sem_pending_last) = q;
> -	*(sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next) = NULL;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void prepend_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
> -				     struct sem_queue * q)
> -{
> -	q->next = sma->sem_pending;
> -	*(q->prev = &sma->sem_pending) = q;
> -	if (q->next)
> -		q->next->prev = &q->next;
> -	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &sma->sem_pending */
> -		sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void remove_from_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
> -				      struct sem_queue * q)
> -{
> -	*(q->prev) = q->next;
> -	if (q->next)
> -		q->next->prev = q->prev;
> -	else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &q->next */
> -		sma->sem_pending_last = q->prev;
> -	q->prev = NULL; /* mark as removed */
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Determine whether a sequence of semaphore operations would succeed
>   * all at once. Return 0 if yes, 1 if need to sleep, else return error code.
> @@ -438,16 +405,15 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
>  	int error;
>  	struct sem_queue * q;
>  
> -	q = sma->sem_pending;
> -	while(q) {
> +	q = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
> +	while(&q->list != &sma->sem_pending) {

I guess here you are not using list_first_entry() because the pending 
requests might be empty?

>  		error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,
>  					 q->undo, q->pid);
>  
>  		/* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */
>  		if (error <= 0) {
>  			struct sem_queue *n;
> -			remove_from_queue(sma,q);
> -			q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
> +
>  			/*
>  			 * Continue scanning. The next operation
>  			 * that must be checked depends on the type of the
> @@ -458,11 +424,24 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
>  			 *   for semaphore values to become 0.
>  			 * - if the operation didn't modify the array,
>  			 *   then just continue.
> +			 * The order of list_del() and reading ->next
> +			 * is crucial: In the former case, the list_del()
> +			 * must be done first [because we might be the
> +			 * first entry in ->sem_pending], in the latter
> +			 * case the list_del() must be done last
> +			 * [because the list is invalid after the list_del()]
>  			 */
> -			if (q->alter)
> -				n = sma->sem_pending;
> -			else
> -				n = q->next;
> +			if (q->alter) {
> +				list_del(&q->list);
> +				n = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
> +			} else {
> +				n = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue, list);
> +				list_del(&q->list);
> +			}
> +
> +			/* wake up the waiting thread */
> +			q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
> +
>  			wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
>  			/* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
>  			 * writing q->status.
> @@ -471,7 +450,7 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
>  			q->status = error;
>  			q = n;
>  		} else {
> -			q = q->next;
> +			q = list_entry(q->list.next, struct sem_queue, list);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -491,7 +470,7 @@ static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
>  	struct sem_queue * q;
>  
>  	semncnt = 0;
> -	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
>  		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
>  		int nsops = q->nsops;
>  		int i;
> @@ -503,13 +482,14 @@ static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
>  	}
>  	return semncnt;
>  }
> +
>  static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
>  {
>  	int semzcnt;
>  	struct sem_queue * q;
>  
>  	semzcnt = 0;
> -	for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(q, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
>  		struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
>  		int nsops = q->nsops;
>  		int i;
> @@ -529,7 +509,7 @@ static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
>  static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
>  {
>  	struct sem_undo *un;
> -	struct sem_queue *q;
> +	struct sem_queue *q, *t;
>  	struct sem_array *sma = container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
>  
>  	/* Invalidate the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.
> @@ -541,17 +521,14 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
>  		un->semid = -1;
>  
>  	/* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
> -	q = sma->sem_pending;
> -	while(q) {
> -		struct sem_queue *n;
> -		/* lazy remove_from_queue: we are killing the whole queue */
> -		q->prev = NULL;
> -		n = q->next;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(q, t, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
> +		list_del(&q->list);
> +
>  		q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
>  		wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */
>  		smp_wmb();
>  		q->status = -EIDRM;	/* hands-off q */
> -		q = n;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Remove the semaphore set from the IDR */
> @@ -1166,9 +1143,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
>  	queue.pid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
>  	queue.alter = alter;
>  	if (alter)
> -		append_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
> +		list_add_tail(&queue.list, &sma->sem_pending);
>  	else
> -		prepend_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
> +		list_add(&queue.list, &sma->sem_pending);
>  
>  	queue.status = -EINTR;
>  	queue.sleeper = current;
> @@ -1194,7 +1171,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
>  
>  	sma = sem_lock(ns, semid);
>  	if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
> -		BUG_ON(queue.prev != NULL);

Instead of removing it why not replacing the bug_ON() by a check on the 
queue still being linked?

>  		error = -EIDRM;
>  		goto out_free;
>  	}
> @@ -1212,7 +1188,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
>  	 */
>  	if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
>  		error = -EAGAIN;
> -	remove_from_queue(sma,&queue);
> +	list_del(&queue.list);
>  	goto out_unlock_free;
>  
>  out_unlock_free:

Will have a look at the last patch + do some tests tomorrow.

Regards,
Nadia


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/4] ipc/sem.c: convert sem_array.sem_pending to struct list_head
  2008-05-29 15:06 ` Nadia Derbey
@ 2008-06-07 14:52   ` Manfred Spraul
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Spraul @ 2008-06-07 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nadia Derbey; +Cc: linux-kernel

Nadia Derbey wrote:
> Manfred Spraul wrote:
>> sem_array.sem_pending is a double linked list, the attached
>> patch converts it to struct list_head.
>>
>> Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
>
> Reviewed-By: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
>
>>
>> @@ -438,16 +405,15 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
>>      int error;
>>      struct sem_queue * q;
>>  
>> -    q = sma->sem_pending;
>> -    while(q) {
>> +    q = list_entry(sma->sem_pending.next, struct sem_queue, list);
>> +    while(&q->list != &sma->sem_pending) {
>
> I guess here you are not using list_first_entry() because the pending 
> requests might be empty?
>
Actually - no. I wasn't aware of list_first_entry().
But:
- Looking at list.h: list_first_entry() shouldn't be used on empty lists.
- the loop in update_queue() is complicated enough, some open-coding 
doesn't hurt.

>> @@ -1194,7 +1171,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, 
>> struct sembuf __user *tsops,
>>  
>>      sma = sem_lock(ns, semid);
>>      if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
>> -        BUG_ON(queue.prev != NULL);
>
> Instead of removing it why not replacing the bug_ON() by a check on 
> the queue still being linked?
>
The list_del() poisoning is IMHO efficient enough.

--
    Manfred

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-07 14:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-24 11:26 [PATCH 3/4] ipc/sem.c: convert sem_array.sem_pending to struct list_head Manfred Spraul
2008-05-29 15:06 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-06-07 14:52   ` Manfred Spraul

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox