* Is 2.6.16.x dead?
@ 2008-06-17 17:24 Miloslav Semler
2008-06-17 21:40 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Miloslav Semler @ 2008-06-17 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: bunk, bunk
Hello,
I would like to know if is 2.6.16.x stable tree dead, or is it still
maintained?
M.S.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Is 2.6.16.x dead?
2008-06-17 17:24 Is 2.6.16.x dead? Miloslav Semler
@ 2008-06-17 21:40 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2008-06-17 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miloslav Semler; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:24:20PM +0200, Miloslav Semler wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Miloslav,
> I would like to know if is 2.6.16.x stable tree dead, or is it still
> maintained?
apologies that the 2.6.16 tree slipped too low to my TODO list.
I'm going since a few days through the backlog and will update it soon.
> M.S.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-17 21:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-17 17:24 Is 2.6.16.x dead? Miloslav Semler
2008-06-17 21:40 ` Adrian Bunk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox