From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:52:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492211C5.7090302@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081118004918.GA19416@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:18:16PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>>> All C-states higher than C1.
>>>
>> Including C2? If so, the TSC is unusable since C2 can be invoked
>> asynchronously by the chipset.
>>
>
> No. Not on Intel CPUs atleast. On Intel CPUs, we enter C-states only on
> hlt or mwait. C1 is always C1 or C1E, where TSC always runs.
> C2, C3, ... implementation vary depending on processor and TSC may or may
> not run. This 0x80000007 feature bit basically says TSC is going to run
> during any C-state.
>
I was under the impression that C2 was invoked by the chipset on a
thermal condition, at least on older (P3-era) processors. Is that no
longer true? If what you say is above (HLT and MWAIT only), then *was*
it ever true?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-18 0:11 [PATCH] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 0:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-11-18 0:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 0:49 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-11-18 1:05 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 3:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-18 3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-18 14:55 ` Joe Korty
2008-11-18 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-18 16:47 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-11-18 16:54 ` Joe Korty
2008-11-18 17:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 16:48 ` Joe Korty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492211C5.7090302@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox