* [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing
@ 2009-03-11 14:55 David Newall
2009-03-11 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Newall @ 2009-03-11 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 313 bytes --]
The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by including
a sleep parameter. This parameter is always zero except in one
instance. This patch clarifies the task of dequeue_patch by removing
the sleep parameter and moving the code that handles non-zero sleep to
that one place where it is needed.
[-- Attachment #2: sched.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1619 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c 2009-02-21 09:09:34.000000000 +1030
+++ linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c.dn 2009-03-12 01:01:48.000000000 +1030
@@ -1645,16 +1645,10 @@
p->se.on_rq = 1;
}
-static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
+static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (sleep && p->se.last_wakeup) {
- update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
- p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
- p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
- }
-
sched_info_dequeued(p);
- p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
p->se.on_rq = 0;
}
@@ -1724,7 +1718,17 @@
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
- dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ if (sleep && p->se.last_wakeup) {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
+ p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
+ p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
+ }
+
+ /*dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);*/
+ sched_info_dequeued(p);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->se.on_rq = 0;
+
dec_nr_running(rq);
}
@@ -4848,7 +4852,7 @@
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
if (running)
p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -4897,7 +4901,7 @@
}
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
set_load_weight(p);
@@ -8637,7 +8641,7 @@
on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, tsk);
if (unlikely(running))
tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing
2009-03-11 14:55 [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing David Newall
@ 2009-03-11 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-11 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Newall; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Peter Zijlstra
* David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com> wrote:
> The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by
> including a sleep parameter. This parameter is always zero
> except in one instance. This patch clarifies the task of
> dequeue_patch by removing the sleep parameter and moving the
> code that handles non-zero sleep to that one place where it is
> needed.
> --- linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c 2009-02-21 09:09:34.000000000 +1030
> +++ linux-2.6.27.19/kernel/sched.c.dn 2009-03-12 01:01:48.000000000 +1030
The patch does not apply cleanly to the latest scheduler tree:
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched.c
You can find it at:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-11 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-11 14:55 [PATCH] make dequeue_task less confusing David Newall
2009-03-11 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox