* [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h
@ 2009-12-18 1:30 Zhaolei
2009-12-18 4:39 ` sniper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhaolei @ 2009-12-18 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; +Cc: LKML
Use simple struct operation instead of address calculation.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 46 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index e5dd628..44a3e98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1264,12 +1264,12 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_device_generation, struct btrfs_dev_item,
static inline char *btrfs_device_uuid(struct btrfs_dev_item *d)
{
- return (char *)d + offsetof(struct btrfs_dev_item, uuid);
+ return (char *)&d->uuid;
}
static inline char *btrfs_device_fsid(struct btrfs_dev_item *d)
{
- return (char *)d + offsetof(struct btrfs_dev_item, fsid);
+ return (char *)&d->fsid;
}
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(chunk_length, struct btrfs_chunk, length, 64);
@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(stripe_offset, struct btrfs_stripe, offset, 64);
static inline char *btrfs_stripe_dev_uuid(struct btrfs_stripe *s)
{
- return (char *)s + offsetof(struct btrfs_stripe, dev_uuid);
+ return (char *)&s->dev_uuid;
}
BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_chunk_length, struct btrfs_chunk, length, 64);
@@ -1310,10 +1310,7 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS(stack_stripe_offset, struct btrfs_stripe, offset, 64);
static inline struct btrfs_stripe *btrfs_stripe_nr(struct btrfs_chunk *c,
int nr)
{
- unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)c;
- offset += offsetof(struct btrfs_chunk, stripe);
- offset += nr * sizeof(struct btrfs_stripe);
- return (struct btrfs_stripe *)offset;
+ return &c->stripe + nr;
}
static inline char *btrfs_stripe_dev_uuid_nr(struct btrfs_chunk *c, int nr)
@@ -1383,33 +1380,25 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(inode_flags, struct btrfs_inode_item, flags, 64);
static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
btrfs_inode_atime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
{
- unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
- ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, atime);
- return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
+ return &inode_item->atime;
}
static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
btrfs_inode_mtime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
{
- unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
- ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, mtime);
- return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
+ return &inode_item->mtime;
}
static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
btrfs_inode_ctime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
{
- unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
- ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, ctime);
- return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
+ return &inode_item->ctime;
}
static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
btrfs_inode_otime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
{
- unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
- ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, otime);
- return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
+ return &inode_item->otime;
}
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(timespec_sec, struct btrfs_timespec, sec, 64);
@@ -1426,8 +1415,7 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(dev_extent_length, struct btrfs_dev_extent, length, 64);
static inline u8 *btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_tree_uuid(struct btrfs_dev_extent *dev)
{
- unsigned long ptr = offsetof(struct btrfs_dev_extent, chunk_tree_uuid);
- return (u8 *)((unsigned long)dev + ptr);
+ return (u8 *)&dev->chunk_tree_uuid;
}
BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(extent_refs, struct btrfs_extent_item, refs, 64);
@@ -1731,26 +1719,22 @@ static inline void btrfs_set_header_backref_rev(struct extent_buffer *eb,
static inline u8 *btrfs_header_fsid(struct extent_buffer *eb)
{
- unsigned long ptr = offsetof(struct btrfs_header, fsid);
- return (u8 *)ptr;
+ return (u8 *)offsetof(struct btrfs_header, fsid);
}
static inline u8 *btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid(struct extent_buffer *eb)
{
- unsigned long ptr = offsetof(struct btrfs_header, chunk_tree_uuid);
- return (u8 *)ptr;
+ return (u8 *)offsetof(struct btrfs_header, chunk_tree_uuid);
}
static inline u8 *btrfs_super_fsid(struct extent_buffer *eb)
{
- unsigned long ptr = offsetof(struct btrfs_super_block, fsid);
- return (u8 *)ptr;
+ return (u8 *)offsetof(struct btrfs_super_block, fsid);
}
static inline u8 *btrfs_header_csum(struct extent_buffer *eb)
{
- unsigned long ptr = offsetof(struct btrfs_header, csum);
- return (u8 *)ptr;
+ return (u8 *)offsetof(struct btrfs_header, csum);
}
static inline struct btrfs_node *btrfs_buffer_node(struct extent_buffer *eb)
@@ -1858,9 +1842,7 @@ BTRFS_SETGET_FUNCS(file_extent_type, struct btrfs_file_extent_item, type, 8);
static inline unsigned long
btrfs_file_extent_inline_start(struct btrfs_file_extent_item *e)
{
- unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)e;
- offset += offsetof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item, disk_bytenr);
- return offset;
+ return (unsigned long)&e->disk_bytenr;
}
static inline u32 btrfs_file_extent_calc_inline_size(u32 datasize)
--
1.5.5.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h
2009-12-18 1:30 [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h Zhaolei
@ 2009-12-18 4:39 ` sniper
2009-12-18 5:51 ` Zhaolei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: sniper @ 2009-12-18 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaolei; +Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML
No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.
Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
&inode_item->xxx
> static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
> btrfs_inode_mtime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
> {
> - unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
> - ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, mtime);
> - return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
> + return &inode_item->mtime;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h
2009-12-18 4:39 ` sniper
@ 2009-12-18 5:51 ` Zhaolei
2009-12-18 6:59 ` sniper
2009-12-18 14:10 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhaolei @ 2009-12-18 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sniper; +Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML
sniper wrote:
> No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
> absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.
> Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
> value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
> &inode_item->xxx
Notice that we are not reach its member, we are getting pointer of its
member with &inode_item->mtime.
This operation have same effect as old one.
Thanks
Zhaolei
>
>> static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
>> btrfs_inode_mtime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
>> {
>> - unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
>> - ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, mtime);
>> - return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
>> + return &inode_item->mtime;
>> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h
2009-12-18 5:51 ` Zhaolei
@ 2009-12-18 6:59 ` sniper
2009-12-18 14:10 ` Chris Mason
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: sniper @ 2009-12-18 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaolei; +Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML
2009/12/18 Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>:
> sniper wrote:
>> No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
>> absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.
>> Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
>> value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
>> &inode_item->xxx
>
> Notice that we are not reach its member, we are getting pointer of its
> member with &inode_item->mtime.
> This operation have same effect as old one.
right!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h
2009-12-18 5:51 ` Zhaolei
2009-12-18 6:59 ` sniper
@ 2009-12-18 14:10 ` Chris Mason
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2009-12-18 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhaolei; +Cc: sniper, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:51:14PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> sniper wrote:
> > No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
> > absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.
> > Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
> > value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
> > &inode_item->xxx
>
> Notice that we are not reach its member, we are getting pointer of its
> member with &inode_item->mtime.
> This operation have same effect as old one.
It relies on gcc doing something specific with the pointer address
manipulation while the original code makes it clear we're just taking
the offset. We do rely on gcc being gcc in lots of places in the code,
but in this case I prefer the offsetof.
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-18 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-18 1:30 [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h Zhaolei
2009-12-18 4:39 ` sniper
2009-12-18 5:51 ` Zhaolei
2009-12-18 6:59 ` sniper
2009-12-18 14:10 ` Chris Mason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox