public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Keshava Munegowda <keshava_mgowda@ti.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: omap-usb-host: Use gpio_request_one
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:02:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED73481.2010904@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322704405.11560.7.camel@phoenix>

Hi Axel,

On 12/01/11 03:53, Axel Lin wrote:
> Use gpio_request_one() instead of multiple gpiolib calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c |   20 +++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> index 86e1458..6533ecc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
> @@ -715,19 +715,13 @@ static int usbhs_enable(struct device *dev)
>  	clk_enable(omap->usbtll_ick);
>  
>  	if (pdata->ehci_data->phy_reset) {
> -		if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[0])) {
> -			gpio_request(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[0],
> -						"USB1 PHY reset");
> -			gpio_direction_output
> -				(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[0], 0);
> -		}
> +		if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[0]))
> +			gpio_request_one(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[0],
> +					 GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "USB1 PHY reset");
>  
> -		if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[1])) {
> -			gpio_request(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[1],
> -						"USB2 PHY reset");
> -			gpio_direction_output
> -				(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[1], 0);
> -		}
> +		if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[1]))
> +			gpio_request_one(pdata->ehci_data->reset_gpio_port[1],
> +					 GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "USB2 PHY reset");

I was wondering, if we need the gpio_is_valid() check here and above?
gpio_request() already does the gpio_is_valid() check,
so why should we double check?


-- 
Regards,
Igor.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-01  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01  1:47 [PATCH 1/4] mfd: aat2870-core: Use gpio_request_one Axel Lin
2011-12-01  1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] mfd: dm355evm_msp: " Axel Lin
2011-12-01  1:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] mfd: omap-usb-host: " Axel Lin
2011-12-01  8:02   ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2011-12-01  1:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] mfd: twl6040-core: " Axel Lin
2011-12-01  8:02   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-12-01  8:18     ` Axel Lin
2011-12-01  9:10       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-12-01  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] mfd: aat2870-core: " Jinyoung Park
2011-12-19 11:13 ` Samuel Ortiz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ED73481.2010904@compulab.co.il \
    --to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
    --cc=keshava_mgowda@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox