From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Fix test_async_driver_probe if NUMA is disabled
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:24:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a2aa8554933c2d004761d5f3e8132018be5ea27.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127202453.28087-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 12:24 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Since commit 57ea974fb871 ("driver core: Rewrite test_async_driver_probe
> to cover serialization and NUMA affinity"), running the test with NUMA
> disabled results in warning messages similar to the following.
>
> test_async_driver test_async_driver.12: NUMA node mismatch -1 != 0
>
> If CONFIG_NUMA=n, dev_to_node(dev) returns -1, and numa_node_id()
> returns 0. Both are widely used, so it appears risky to change return
> values. Augment the check with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) instead
> to fix the problem.
>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 57ea974fb871 ("driver core: Rewrite test_async_driver_probe to cover serialization and NUMA affinity")
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c b/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
> index f4b1d8e54daf..3bb7beb127a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/test/test_async_driver_probe.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ static int test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * performing an async init on that node.
> */
> if (dev->driver->probe_type == PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS) {
> - if (dev_to_node(dev) != numa_node_id()) {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) &&
> + dev_to_node(dev) != numa_node_id()) {
> dev_warn(dev, "NUMA node mismatch %d != %d\n",
> dev_to_node(dev), numa_node_id());
> atomic_inc(&warnings);
I'm not sure that is really the correct fix. It might be better to test it
against NUMA_NO_NODE and then if it is not that make sure that it matches
the node ID. Adding the check against NUMA_NO_NODE would resolve the issue
for cases where the device might be assigned to multiple NUMA nodes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-27 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-27 20:24 [PATCH] driver core: Fix test_async_driver_probe if NUMA is disabled Guenter Roeck
2019-11-27 21:24 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2019-11-27 22:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-11-27 23:13 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-11-28 0:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-12-04 17:18 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-12-09 20:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-12-09 20:59 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a2aa8554933c2d004761d5f3e8132018be5ea27.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox