Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: support runtime PM for BYT SD cards

Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: support runtime PM for BYT SD cards

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:

> Here are 3 patches to support runtime PM for BYT SD cards
>
> Please note that these patches are dependent upon 2 gpio patches
> that are in linux-next and linux-gpio but not the mmc tree.
> Those patches are:
>
>         author  Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>       2013-04-03 10:56:54 (GMT)
>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-11 22:31:18 (GMT)
>         commit  12028d2d216220618f76284af5f8ed510b11da55 (patch)
>         gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper
>
>         author  Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>  2013-04-09 13:57:25 (GMT)
>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-10 21:41:17 (GMT)
>         commit  7fc7acb9a0b0ff3ffdf21818fe0735ebaf4fecb8 (patch)
>         gpio / ACPI: Handle ACPI events in accordance with the spec
>
> I think those patches are queued for 3.10.
>
> cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

No they are currently not, and will as it looks right now *not* be in v3.10 due
to a screwup from my side, and that screwup walking the ladder to
Torvalds where it exploded. So he's not pulling the GPIO tree this merge
window.

So just sit back and synchronize this for v3.11 (surely they can be taken
through the GPIO tree if Chris gives his ACK on them).

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: support runtime PM for BYT SD cards

[Adrian Hunter]

On 06/05/13 22:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Here are 3 patches to support runtime PM for BYT SD cards
>>
>> Please note that these patches are dependent upon 2 gpio patches
>> that are in linux-next and linux-gpio but not the mmc tree.
>> Those patches are:
>>
>>         author  Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>       2013-04-03 10:56:54 (GMT)
>>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-11 22:31:18 (GMT)
>>         commit  12028d2d216220618f76284af5f8ed510b11da55 (patch)
>>         gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper
>>
>>         author  Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>  2013-04-09 13:57:25 (GMT)
>>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-10 21:41:17 (GMT)
>>         commit  7fc7acb9a0b0ff3ffdf21818fe0735ebaf4fecb8 (patch)
>>         gpio / ACPI: Handle ACPI events in accordance with the spec
>>
>> I think those patches are queued for 3.10.
>>
>> cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> No they are currently not, and will as it looks right now *not* be in v3.10 due
> to a screwup from my side, and that screwup walking the ladder to
> Torvalds where it exploded. So he's not pulling the GPIO tree this merge
> window.
> 
> So just sit back and synchronize this for v3.11 (surely they can be taken
> through the GPIO tree if Chris gives his ACK on them).

3.11 is fine, but one of the patches:

	 [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add ability to stay runtime-resumed if the card is powered up

really should be in the mmc tree.

It would be simpler if the above 2 ACPI GPIO patches made it to 3.10 or went via the mmc tree.
Adding Rafael in case he can still take them for 3.10.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: support runtime PM for BYT SD cards

[Westerberg, Mika]

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:00:48AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 06/05/13 22:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Here are 3 patches to support runtime PM for BYT SD cards
> >>
> >> Please note that these patches are dependent upon 2 gpio patches
> >> that are in linux-next and linux-gpio but not the mmc tree.
> >> Those patches are:
> >>
> >>         author  Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>       2013-04-03 10:56:54 (GMT)
> >>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-11 22:31:18 (GMT)
> >>         commit  12028d2d216220618f76284af5f8ed510b11da55 (patch)
> >>         gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper
> >>
> >>         author  Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>  2013-04-09 13:57:25 (GMT)
> >>         committer       Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>        2013-04-10 21:41:17 (GMT)
> >>         commit  7fc7acb9a0b0ff3ffdf21818fe0735ebaf4fecb8 (patch)
> >>         gpio / ACPI: Handle ACPI events in accordance with the spec
> >>
> >> I think those patches are queued for 3.10.
> >>
> >> cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > No they are currently not, and will as it looks right now *not* be in v3.10 due
> > to a screwup from my side, and that screwup walking the ladder to
> > Torvalds where it exploded. So he's not pulling the GPIO tree this merge
> > window.
> > 
> > So just sit back and synchronize this for v3.11 (surely they can be taken
> > through the GPIO tree if Chris gives his ACK on them).
> 
> 3.11 is fine, but one of the patches:
> 
> 	 [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add ability to stay runtime-resumed if the card is powered up
> 
> really should be in the mmc tree.
> 
> It would be simpler if the above 2 ACPI GPIO patches made it to 3.10 or went via the mmc tree.
> Adding Rafael in case he can still take them for 3.10.

Looks like Linus pulled GPIO changes already. So they should be available
for 3.10.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmc: sdhci: support runtime PM for BYT SD cards

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Westerberg, Mika
<mika.westerberg@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:00:48AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:

>> It would be simpler if the above 2 ACPI GPIO patches made it to 3.10 or went via the mmc tree.
>> Adding Rafael in case he can still take them for 3.10.
>
> Looks like Linus pulled GPIO changes already. So they should be available
> for 3.10.

Yes it appears he (the other Linus) changed his mind, that's fine then...

Yours,
Linus Walleij