From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: max77686: Split out regulator part from the DT binding
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:20:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A374C8.8020103@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A370CE.6080904@samsung.com>
Hello Krzysztof,
On 07/13/2015 10:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13.07.2015 16:42, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The Maxim MAX77686 PMIC is a multi-function device with regulators,
>> clocks and a RTC. The DT bindings for the clocks are in a separate
>> file but the bindings for the regulators are inside the mfd part.
>>
>> To make it consistent with the clocks portion of the binding and
>> because is more natural to look for regulator bindings under the
>> bindings/regulator sub-directory, split the regulator portion of
>> the DT binding and add it as a separate file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 58 +-----------------
>> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt
>
> Actually I would prefer the opposite - merging everything into one file
> (clocks, regulators -> mfd) because:
>
> 1. Separate files introduce some duplication (like introduction and
> common part of example node).
>
> 2. It is easier to track the changes and update them. For example when
> adding a new chipset to the driver one may forgot about updating other
> files. When moving files one may forgot to update hard-coded path in
> some other file.
>
> 3. When comparing existing DTS with documentation or when creating new
> DTS for the device it is just faster to fetch everything (knowledge,
> example node) from one file.
>
Yes, I also wondered about going the opposite way but then thought
that is more natural to look for clock bindings under bindings/clock
and for regulators drivers under bindings/regulator...
> However I understand that such opinion may be not suited for the idea of
> MFD...
>
...but I don't have a strong opinion and can do the other way if folks
are more fond with that single file approach.
What I think is that it should be consistent, either everything is in mfd
for all PMICs or everything is split.
The max77686 for example has a somehow arbitrary split since the clocks
are in another file but the regulators are in the same mfd binding doc.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 7:42 [PATCH 0/3] mfd: Improve DT binding docs for max77686 and max77802 Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 7:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] mfd: max77686: Don't suggest in binding to use a deprecated property Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 7:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Add DT binding for Maxim MAX77802 IC Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 7:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 8:11 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 13:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-07-13 13:26 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 7:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mfd: max77686: Split out regulator part from the DT binding Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-13 8:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 8:20 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A374C8.8020103@osg.samsung.com \
--to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox