public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow  vpid
       [not found] <1442313034-14243-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
@ 2015-09-15 10:30 ` Wanpeng Li
  2015-09-15 12:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2015-09-15 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: nVMX: nested VPID emulation Wanpeng Li
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2015-09-15 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Jan Kiszka, Bandan Das, Wincy Van, kvm, linux-kernel, Wanpeng Li

Enhance allocate/free_vid to handle shadow vpid.

Suggested-by: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index da1590e..bd07d88 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -424,6 +424,8 @@ struct nested_vmx {
 	/* to migrate it to L2 if VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS is off */
 	u64 vmcs01_debugctl;
 
+	u16 vpid02;
+
 	u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low;
 	u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high;
 	u32 nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low;
@@ -4155,18 +4157,29 @@ static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm)
 	return r;
 }
 
-static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
+static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, bool nested)
 {
 	int vpid;
 
-	vmx->vpid = 0;
 	if (!enable_vpid)
 		return;
+	if (!nested)
+		vmx->vpid = 0;
+	else
+		vmx->nested.vpid02 = 0;
 	spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
-	vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
-	if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
+	if (!nested) {
+		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
+		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
 		vmx->vpid = vpid;
 		__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
+		}
+	} else {
+		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
+		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
+			vmx->nested.vpid02 = vpid;
+			__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
+		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
 }
@@ -4178,6 +4191,12 @@ static void free_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
 	if (vmx->vpid != 0)
 		__clear_bit(vmx->vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
+	if (!nested) {
+		spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (vmx->nested.vpid02)
+		__clear_bit(vmx->nested.vpid02, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
 	spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
 }
 
@@ -8509,7 +8528,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 	if (!vmx)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	allocate_vpid(vmx);
+	allocate_vpid(vmx, false);
 
 	err = kvm_vcpu_init(&vmx->vcpu, kvm, id);
 	if (err)
@@ -8557,8 +8576,10 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
 			goto free_vmcs;
 	}
 
-	if (nested)
+	if (nested) {
 		nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(vmx);
+		allocate_vpid(vmx, true);
+	}
 
 	vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv = -1;
 	vmx->nested.current_vmptr = -1ull;
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: nVMX: nested VPID emulation
       [not found] <1442313034-14243-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
  2015-09-15 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid Wanpeng Li
@ 2015-09-15 10:30 ` Wanpeng Li
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2015-09-15 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Jan Kiszka, Bandan Das, Wincy Van, kvm, linux-kernel, Wanpeng Li

VPID is used to tag address space and avoid a TLB flush. Currently L0 use 
the same VPID to run L1 and all its guests. KVM flushes VPID when switching 
between L1 and L2. 

This patch advertises VPID to the L1 hypervisor, then address space of L1 and 
L2 can be separately treated and avoid TLB flush when swithing between L1 and 
L2. For each nested vmentry, if vpid12 is changed, reuse shadow vpid w/ an 
invvpid.

Performance: 

run lmbench on L2 w/ 3.5 kernel.

Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Host                 OS  2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K
                         ctxsw  ctxsw  ctxsw ctxsw  ctxsw   ctxsw   ctxsw
--------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
kernel    Linux 3.5.0-1 1.2200 1.3700 1.4500 4.7800 2.3300 5.60000 2.88000  nested VPID 
kernel    Linux 3.5.0-1 1.2600 1.4300 1.5600   12.7   12.9 3.49000 7.46000  vanilla

Suggested-by: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index bd07d88..6d8ec00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ struct nested_vmx {
 	u64 vmcs01_debugctl;
 
 	u16 vpid02;
+	u16 last_vpid;
 
 	u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low;
 	u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high;
@@ -1159,6 +1160,11 @@ static inline bool nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 	return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE);
 }
 
+static inline bool nested_cpu_has_vpid(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
+{
+	return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID);
+}
+
 static inline bool nested_cpu_has_apic_reg_virt(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 {
 	return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT);
@@ -2473,6 +2479,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_RDTSCP |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE |
+		SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VPID |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING |
@@ -9460,13 +9467,17 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 		vmcs_write64(TSC_OFFSET, vmx->nested.vmcs01_tsc_offset);
 
 	if (enable_vpid) {
-		/*
-		 * Trivially support vpid by letting L2s share their parent
-		 * L1's vpid. TODO: move to a more elaborate solution, giving
-		 * each L2 its own vpid and exposing the vpid feature to L1.
-		 */
-		vmcs_write16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, vmx->vpid);
-		vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu);
+		if (nested_cpu_has_vpid(vmcs12)) {
+			vmcs_write16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, vmx->nested.vpid02);
+			if (vmcs12->virtual_processor_id != vmx->nested.last_vpid) {
+				vmx->nested.last_vpid = vmcs12->virtual_processor_id;
+				vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu);
+			}
+		} else {
+			vmcs_write16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, vmx->vpid);
+			vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu);
+		}
+
 	}
 
 	if (nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12)) {
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid
  2015-09-15 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid Wanpeng Li
@ 2015-09-15 12:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
  2015-09-16  3:58     ` Wanpeng Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2015-09-15 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wanpeng Li; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Bandan Das, Wincy Van, kvm, linux-kernel



On 15/09/2015 12:30, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> +	if (!nested) {
> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
>  		vmx->vpid = vpid;
>  		__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
> +			vmx->nested.vpid02 = vpid;
> +			__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
> +		}

Messy indentation, and a lot of duplicate code.  Can you instead have
(which I think was Jan's suggestion too):

static int allocate_vpid(void);
static void free_vpid(int vpid);

That said, I like the simple solution to the "too many VPIDs for each L1
VCPU" processor.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid
  2015-09-15 12:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2015-09-16  3:58     ` Wanpeng Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2015-09-16  3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Jan Kiszka, Bandan Das, Wincy Van, kvm, linux-kernel

On 9/15/15 8:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 15/09/2015 12:30, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> +	if (!nested) {
>> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
>> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
>>   		vmx->vpid = vpid;
>>   		__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
>> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
>> +			vmx->nested.vpid02 = vpid;
>> +			__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
>> +		}
> Messy indentation, and a lot of duplicate code.  Can you instead have
> (which I think was Jan's suggestion too):
>
> static int allocate_vpid(void);
> static void free_vpid(int vpid);

I see, done in v3.

>
> That said, I like the simple solution to the "too many VPIDs for each L1
> VCPU" processor.

Thanks. :-)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-16  3:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1442313034-14243-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
2015-09-15 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid Wanpeng Li
2015-09-15 12:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-16  3:58     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-15 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: nVMX: nested VPID emulation Wanpeng Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox