From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
a.zummo@towertech.it, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:21:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BA03EB.3090103@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56BA0049.6070500@nvidia.com>
Hello Laxman,
On 02/09/2016 12:05 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
>> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>>
>
> Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?
>
You will need to re-spin anyways since patch 6/6 does not apply
cleanly anymore on top of rtc-next as we talked before.
So make your v7 to only include patches 2-6 and post 1/6 as a
separate patch so Mark can pick it through the regmap tree.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-09 12:28 [PATCH V6 0/6] rtc: max77686: make max77686 rtc driver as IP driver Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 13:27 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-09 13:58 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 14:24 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-09 15:14 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-09 15:05 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 15:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2016-02-09 14:50 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-02-09 16:16 ` Applied "regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain" to the regmap tree Mark Brown
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 2/6] rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 3/6] rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 4/6] rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 5/6] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 12:28 ` [PATCH V6 6/6] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BA03EB.3090103@osg.samsung.com \
--to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox