From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ckadabi@codeaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jnair@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:29:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58d36133-4f83-99f3-0423-7a80f3dd82f8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126153314.GW5862@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
On 26/01/18 15:33, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:28:09PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Some variants of the Arm Cortex-55 cores (r0p0, r0p1, r1p0) suffer
>> from an erratum 1024718, which causes incorrect updates when DBM/AP
>> bits in a page table entry is modified without a break-before-make
>> sequence. The work around is to skip enabling the hardware DBM feature
>> on the affected cores. The hardware Access Flag management features
>> is not affected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 8af755b8219d..64f1e911c6af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -914,9 +914,21 @@ static inline void __cpu_enable_hw_dbm(void)
>> isb();
>> }
>>
>> +static bool cpu_has_erratum_1024718(void)
>> +{
>> + static const struct midr_range __maybe_unused cpus[] = {
>
> Do you need __maybe_unused? If #ifdef were used here then
> __maybe_unused would be needed, but I thought that if code is optimised
> out instead of conditionally copiled, this didn't apply.
Yep. I don't know if the compiler could optimise the array itself with
the tag as a hint. I will double check.
>
>> + MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A55, 0, 0, 1, 0), // A55 r0p0 -r1p0
>> + {},
>> + };
>> +
>> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1024718) &&
>> + is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), cpus);
>
> Why have a list with just one entry? Do you expect more entries over
> time?
Yes. I should have mentioned it here. See [1]
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-January/554516.html
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-23 12:27 [PATCH 00/16] arm64: Rework cpu capabilities handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 01/16] arm64: capabilities: Update prototype for enable call back Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 14:52 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 15:38 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-25 15:36 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-25 16:57 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-29 16:35 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 02/16] arm64: Move errata work around check on boot CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 14:59 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 15:07 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 15:11 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 03/16] arm64: Move errata capability processing code Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 04/16] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for fine grained capabilities Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 17:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-24 18:45 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-25 13:43 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-25 17:08 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-25 17:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-25 17:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-25 17:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 12:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/16] arm64: Add flags to check the safety of a capability for late CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 10:10 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-30 11:17 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-30 14:56 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-30 15:06 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/16] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 11:08 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 12:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-29 16:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 07/16] arm64: capabilities: Filter the entries based on a given type Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 11:22 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 12:21 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-29 17:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 08/16] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 11:47 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 12:31 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-29 17:14 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-29 17:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-30 15:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 09/16] arm64: capabilities: Introduce strict features based on local CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 12:12 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-30 11:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 10/16] arm64: Make KPTI strict CPU local feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 12:25 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 15:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-29 17:24 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 11/16] arm64: errata: Clean up midr range helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 13:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 12/16] arm64: Add helpers for checking CPU MIDR against a range Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 14:08 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: Add support for checking errata based on a list of MIDRS Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 14:16 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 15:57 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-30 15:16 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-30 15:38 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-30 15:58 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm64: Add MIDR encoding for Arm Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm64: Delay enabling hardware DBM feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 14:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 16:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-30 15:22 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-26 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-26 16:29 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2018-01-30 15:27 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58d36133-4f83-99f3-0423-7a80f3dd82f8@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ckadabi@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jnair@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox