From: syzbot <syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state()
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:10:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68d2d480.a70a0220.1b52b.02b4.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68d26227.a70a0220.1b52b.02a4.GAE@google.com>
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
***
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state()
Author: listout@listout.xyz
#syz test
Syzkaller reported a general protection fault due to a NULL pointer
dereference in print_reg_state() when accessing reg->map_ptr without
checking if it is NULL.
The existing code assumes reg->map_ptr is always valid before
dereferencing reg->map_ptr->name, reg->map_ptr->key_size, and
reg->map_ptr->value_size.
Fix this by adding explicit NULL checks before accessing reg->map_ptr
and its members. This prevents crashes when reg->map_ptr is NULL,
improving the robustness of the BPF verifier's verbose logging.
Reported-by: syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <listout@listout.xyz>
---
kernel/bpf/log.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 38050f4ee400..14c0a442a85b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -715,11 +715,10 @@ static void print_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose_a("ref_obj_id=%d", reg->ref_obj_id);
if (type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type))
verbose_a("%s", "non_own_ref");
- if (type_is_map_ptr(t)) {
+ if (type_is_map_ptr(t) && reg->map_ptr) {
if (reg->map_ptr->name[0])
verbose_a("map=%s", reg->map_ptr->name);
- verbose_a("ks=%d,vs=%d",
- reg->map_ptr->key_size,
+ verbose_a("ks=%d,vs=%d", reg->map_ptr->key_size,
reg->map_ptr->value_size);
}
if (t != SCALAR_VALUE && reg->off) {
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 9:02 [syzbot] [bpf?] general protection fault in print_reg_state syzbot
2025-09-23 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state() Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 19:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-09-23 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state() Brahmajit Das
2025-09-23 18:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-23 17:10 ` syzbot [this message]
2025-09-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24 7:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24 9:09 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24 15:40 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24 17:38 ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-24 18:28 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-25 15:31 ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-26 1:04 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-26 1:56 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-26 10:36 ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-30 18:21 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 5:08 ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-29 18:23 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] general protection fault in print_reg_state syzbot
2025-10-01 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 16:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-01 18:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 18:49 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 18:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 18:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 " Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-10-01 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68d2d480.a70a0220.1b52b.02b4.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox