public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Brahmajit Das <listout@listout.xyz>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, 	haoluo@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	sdf@fomichev.me, 	song@kernel.org,
	syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	KaFai Wan	 <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 12:32:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f72a29f419377ac9e3ddd7ae56bc1e0826058c6.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001191739.2323644-2-listout@listout.xyz>

On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 00:47 +0530, Brahmajit Das wrote:
> In check_alu_op(), the verifier currently calls check_reg_arg() and
> adjust_scalar_min_max_vals() unconditionally for BPF_NEG operations.
> However, if the destination register holds a pointer, these scalar
> adjustments are unnecessary and potentially incorrect.
> 
> This patch adds a check to skip the adjustment logic when the destination
> register contains a pointer.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58
> Fixes: aced132599b3 ("bpf: Add range tracking for BPF_NEG")
> Suggested-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
> Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <listout@listout.xyz>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-01 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23  9:02 [syzbot] [bpf?] general protection fault in print_reg_state syzbot
2025-09-23 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state() Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:17   ` [PATCH v4 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:17     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:32       ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-10-01 19:17     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:33       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 21:10     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-09-23 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in print_reg_state() Brahmajit Das
2025-09-23 18:52   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-23 17:10 ` Forwarded: [PATCH] " syzbot
2025-09-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24  7:32   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24  9:09     ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24 15:40     ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-24 17:28       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24 17:38       ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-24 18:28         ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-25 15:31           ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-26  1:04             ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-26  1:56               ` Brahmajit Das
2025-09-26 10:36               ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-30 18:21                 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01  5:08                   ` KaFai Wan
2025-09-29 18:23 ` [syzbot] [bpf?] general protection fault in print_reg_state syzbot
2025-10-01  9:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01  9:56   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 16:55     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-01 18:29     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 18:49       ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 18:54         ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01  9:56   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 18:37     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 18:40   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] bpf: Fix verifier crash on BPF_NEG with pointer register Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-01 19:28 ` [PATCH v4 " Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 19:28   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Skip scalar adjustment for BPF_NEG if dst is a pointer Brahmajit Das
2025-10-01 21:10     ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-10-01 19:28   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for BPF_NEG alu on CONST_PTR_TO_MAP Brahmajit Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8f72a29f419377ac9e3ddd7ae56bc1e0826058c6.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai.wan@linux.dev \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=listout@listout.xyz \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+d36d5ae81e1b0a53ef58@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox