public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: 25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn
Cc: 25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn, davem@davemloft.net,
	dsahern@kernel.org,  edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,  sd@queasysnail.net,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:27:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69eae312.a00a0220.9259.0030.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eabb1a1.7642.19dbd869da3.Coremail.25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>

> Hi Sabrina and Jakub,
>
> Before sending out the v3 patch, I synced my tree to the latest mainline and checked the current state of `ip6_make_skb()`. 
>
> It turns out that the missing `ip6_cork_release(cork)` in the error path was already naturally resolved by Eric Dumazet's recent refactoring commit:
> b409a7f7176b ("ipv6: colocate inet6_cork in inet_cork_full")
>
> With Eric's changes, the error handling now correctly calls `ip6_cork_release(cork)` if `ip6_setup_cork()` fails, meaning the memory leak is no longer present in the latest tree.
>
> Please disregard my v1 and v2 patches. I am also telling syzbot to close this report based on Eric's commit.
>
> Thank you all again for your time, the deep code review, and for guiding me to find the true root cause. I learned a huge amount from this discussion!
>
> #syz fix: ipv6: colocate inet6_cork in inet_cork_full

I see the command but can't find the corresponding bug.
The email is sent to  syzbot+HASH@syzkaller.appspotmail.com address
but the HASH does not correspond to any known bug.
Please double check the address.

>
> Best regards,
> Mingyu Wang
>
> 2026-04-24 11:16:30 "王明煜" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn> 写道:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thank you so much for the review and for pointing me to the correct Fixes tag!
>> 
>> You hit the nail on the head regarding `__ip6_append_data()`. After re-evaluating the code path based on your question, I realize my assumption in v2 was incorrect. `__ip6_append_data()` does indeed guarantee that an skb is queued upon success, making the `skb == NULL` path dead code in this context.
>> 
>> I traced the `failslab` memory leak back to its true origin: the lockless fast path wrapper `ip6_make_skb()`.
>> 
>> Sabrina previously noted that `ip6_setup_cork()` failures correctly release the dst. That is absolutely true for the slow path, where `udp_v6_flush_pending_frames()` eventually handles the cleanup. 
>> 
>> However, in the fast path, `ip6_make_skb()` calls `ip6_setup_cork()`. Inside `ip6_setup_cork()`, `cork->base.dst` is assigned early. If a subsequent memory allocation fails (e.g., `v6_cork->opt = kzalloc(...)` failing due to failslab), it returns an error. `ip6_make_skb()` then directly returns `ERR_PTR(err)` WITHOUT calling `ip6_cork_release(cork)`.
>> 
>> Since `udpv6_sendmsg()` assumes the `dst` reference is stolen by `ip6_make_skb()` and unconditionally jumps to `out_no_dst`, the `dst` is completely leaked.
>> 
>> The fix is simply to add `ip6_cork_release(cork)` in the `ip6_setup_cork()` error path inside `ip6_make_skb()`.
>> 
>> I will submit a v3 patch shortly addressing this true root cause and using your suggested Fixes tag. Thank you again for steering me in the exact right direction!
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Mingyu Wang
>> 
>> 
>> > -----原始邮件-----
>> > 发件人: "Willem de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
>> > 发送时间:2026-04-23 22:59:45 (星期四)
>> > 收件人: "Mingyu Wang" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
>> > 抄送: sd@queasysnail.net, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mingyu Wang" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>, syzbot+e5d6936b9f4545fd88ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> > 主题: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty
>> > 
>> > Mingyu Wang wrote:
>> > > During fuzzing with failslab enabled, a memory leak was observed in the
>> > > IPv6 UDP send path.
>> > > 
>> > > The root cause resides in __ip6_make_skb(). In extremely rare cases
>> > > (such as fault injection or specific empty payload conditions),
>> > 
>> > Can you elaborate on this? Which fault injection lets
>> > __ip6_append_data succeed without writing data?
>> > 
>> > > __ip6_append_data() may succeed but leave the socket's write queue
>> > > empty.
>> > > 
>> > > When __ip6_make_skb() is subsequently called, __skb_dequeue(queue)
>> > > returns NULL. The previous logic handled this by executing a 'goto out;',
>> > > which completely bypassed the call to ip6_cork_release(cork).
>> > > 
>> > > Since the 'cork' structure actively holds a reference to the routing
>> > > entry (dst_entry) and potentially other allocated options, skipping
>> > > the release cleanly leaks these resources.
>> > > 
>> > > Fix this by introducing an 'out_cork_release' label and jumping to it
>> > > when skb is NULL, ensuring the cork state is always properly cleaned up.
>> > > The now-unused 'out' label is also removed to prevent compiler warnings.
>> > > 
>> > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>> > 
>> > I think this is 
>> > 
>> > Fixes: 6422398c2ab0 ("ipv6: introduce ipv6_make_skb")
>> > 
>> > > Reported-by: syzbot+e5d6936b9f4545fd88ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> > > Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23  8:22 [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty Mingyu Wang
2026-04-23  8:23 ` syzbot
2026-04-23 14:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-23 14:59   ` syzbot
2026-04-24  3:16   ` 王明煜
2026-04-24  3:16     ` syzbot
2026-04-24  3:26     ` 王明煜
2026-04-24  3:27       ` syzbot [this message]
2026-04-24  6:56       ` Bezdeka, Florian
2026-04-24  6:56         ` syzbot
2026-04-24 15:40         ` 王明煜
2026-04-24 15:40           ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69eae312.a00a0220.9259.0030.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox