From: syzbot <syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: florian.bezdeka@siemens.com
Cc: 25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
florian.bezdeka@siemens.com, horms@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:56:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69eb142a.a00a0220.9259.0034.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68628d54304821fe8410e756ce3f92c60da10e1d.camel@siemens.com>
> On Fri, 2026-04-24 at 11:26 +0800, 王明煜 wrote:
>> Hi Sabrina and Jakub,
>>
>> Before sending out the v3 patch, I synced my tree to the latest mainline and checked the current state of `ip6_make_skb()`.
>>
>> It turns out that the missing `ip6_cork_release(cork)` in the error path was already naturally resolved by Eric Dumazet's recent refactoring commit:
>> b409a7f7176b ("ipv6: colocate inet6_cork in inet_cork_full")
>>
>> With Eric's changes, the error handling now correctly calls `ip6_cork_release(cork)` if `ip6_setup_cork()` fails, meaning the memory leak is no longer present in the latest tree.
>
> Fine, so mainline is correct now. What about the stable trees? Did you
> check them already?
>
> Florian
>
>>
>> Please disregard my v1 and v2 patches. I am also telling syzbot to close this report based on Eric's commit.
>>
>> Thank you all again for your time, the deep code review, and for guiding me to find the true root cause. I learned a huge amount from this discussion!
>>
>> #syz fix: ipv6: colocate inet6_cork in inet_cork_full
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Mingyu Wang
>>
>> 2026-04-24 11:16:30 "王明煜" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn> 写道:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thank you so much for the review and for pointing me to the correct Fixes tag!
>> >
>> > You hit the nail on the head regarding `__ip6_append_data()`. After re-evaluating the code path based on your question, I realize my assumption in v2 was incorrect. `__ip6_append_data()` does indeed guarantee that an skb is queued upon success, making the `skb == NULL` path dead code in this context.
>> >
>> > I traced the `failslab` memory leak back to its true origin: the lockless fast path wrapper `ip6_make_skb()`.
>> >
>> > Sabrina previously noted that `ip6_setup_cork()` failures correctly release the dst. That is absolutely true for the slow path, where `udp_v6_flush_pending_frames()` eventually handles the cleanup.
>> >
>> > However, in the fast path, `ip6_make_skb()` calls `ip6_setup_cork()`. Inside `ip6_setup_cork()`, `cork->base.dst` is assigned early. If a subsequent memory allocation fails (e.g., `v6_cork->opt = kzalloc(...)` failing due to failslab), it returns an error. `ip6_make_skb()` then directly returns `ERR_PTR(err)` WITHOUT calling `ip6_cork_release(cork)`.
>> >
>> > Since `udpv6_sendmsg()` assumes the `dst` reference is stolen by `ip6_make_skb()` and unconditionally jumps to `out_no_dst`, the `dst` is completely leaked.
>> >
>> > The fix is simply to add `ip6_cork_release(cork)` in the `ip6_setup_cork()` error path inside `ip6_make_skb()`.
>> >
>> > I will submit a v3 patch shortly addressing this true root cause and using your suggested Fixes tag. Thank you again for steering me in the exact right direction!
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Mingyu Wang
>> >
>> >
>> > > -----原始邮件-----
>> > > 发件人: "Willem de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
>> > > 发送时间:2026-04-23 22:59:45 (星期四)
>> > > 收件人: "Mingyu Wang" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
>> > > 抄送: sd@queasysnail.net, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mingyu Wang" <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>, syzbot+e5d6936b9f4545fd88ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> > > 主题: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty
>> > >
>> > > Mingyu Wang wrote:
>> > > > During fuzzing with failslab enabled, a memory leak was observed in the
>> > > > IPv6 UDP send path.
>> > > >
>> > > > The root cause resides in __ip6_make_skb(). In extremely rare cases
>> > > > (such as fault injection or specific empty payload conditions),
>> > >
>> > > Can you elaborate on this? Which fault injection lets
>> > > __ip6_append_data succeed without writing data?
>> > >
>> > > > __ip6_append_data() may succeed but leave the socket's write queue
>> > > > empty.
>> > > >
>> > > > When __ip6_make_skb() is subsequently called, __skb_dequeue(queue)
>> > > > returns NULL. The previous logic handled this by executing a 'goto out;',
>> > > > which completely bypassed the call to ip6_cork_release(cork).
>> > > >
>> > > > Since the 'cork' structure actively holds a reference to the routing
>> > > > entry (dst_entry) and potentially other allocated options, skipping
>> > > > the release cleanly leaks these resources.
>> > > >
>> > > > Fix this by introducing an 'out_cork_release' label and jumping to it
>> > > > when skb is NULL, ensuring the cork state is always properly cleaned up.
>> > > > The now-unused 'out' label is also removed to prevent compiler warnings.
>> > > >
>> > > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>> > >
>> > > I think this is
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: 6422398c2ab0 ("ipv6: introduce ipv6_make_skb")
>> > >
>> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+e5d6936b9f4545fd88ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
I see the command but can't find the corresponding bug.
The email is sent to syzbot+HASH@syzkaller.appspotmail.com address
but the HASH does not correspond to any known bug.
Please double check the address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 8:22 [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix memory leak in __ip6_make_skb() when queue is empty Mingyu Wang
2026-04-23 8:23 ` syzbot
2026-04-23 14:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-23 14:59 ` syzbot
2026-04-24 3:16 ` 王明煜
2026-04-24 3:16 ` syzbot
2026-04-24 3:26 ` 王明煜
2026-04-24 3:27 ` syzbot
2026-04-24 6:56 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2026-04-24 6:56 ` syzbot [this message]
2026-04-24 15:40 ` 王明煜
2026-04-24 15:40 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69eb142a.a00a0220.9259.0034.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox