* [PATCH v2] ntfs: fix name offset validation in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid
@ 2026-08-06 1:39 Hongling Zeng
2026-08-06 2:38 ` Hongling Zeng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hongling Zeng @ 2026-08-06 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linkinjeon, hyc.lee, alexandro.calo
Cc: ntfs, linux-kernel, zhongling0719, Hongling Zeng, stable
ntfs_attr_update_meta() performs memmove operations on attribute names
when converting between sparse and non-sparse attributes:
- Converting to sparse shifts the name forward by 8 bytes
(name_offset + 8)
- Converting from sparse shifts the name backward by 8 bytes
(name_offset - 8)
However, the validator does not check that name_offset is within safe
boundaries for these operations. A malicious MFT record could set
name_offset such that:
1. The name is positioned at the very end of a non-sparse attribute.
Converting to sparse would shift the name forward by 8 bytes,
writing beyond the attribute boundary.
2. The name overlaps with the mapping pairs, causing corruption during
conversion.
Add validation to ensure:
- For named attributes, name_offset is within valid bounds
- Name does not extend beyond the attribute or overlap with mapping pairs
- For non-sparse attributes, name_end + 8 fits within attr_len to allow
room for the forward shift when becoming sparse
Note: name_offset validation only applies when name_length != 0, as
unnamed attributes use name_offset = 0 which is valid.
Fixes: 7e2a1c554bc4 ("ntfs: Fix min_len for compressed/sparse attributes in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
---
Changes in v2:
- Read name_length directly as an 8-bit field instead of using
le16_to_cpu().
- Restrict the name forward-shift bounds check to the same attribute
types that can actually be converted by ntfs_attr_update_meta().
---
fs/ntfs/attrib.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
index d354c3b0fae1..ffd08633970a 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
@@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ static bool ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid(const struct attr_record *a)
u32 attr_len;
u32 min_len;
u16 mp_offset;
+ u16 name_offset;
+ u8 name_len;
+ u32 name_end;
attr_len = le32_to_cpu(a->length);
min_len = offsetof(struct attr_record, data.non_resident.initialized_size) +
@@ -706,7 +709,35 @@ static bool ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid(const struct attr_record *a)
return false;
mp_offset = le16_to_cpu(a->data.non_resident.mapping_pairs_offset);
- return mp_offset >= min_len && mp_offset <= attr_len;
+ if (mp_offset < min_len || mp_offset > attr_len)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Validate name_offset for named attributes.
+ * may be zero for unnamed attributes.
+ */
+ name_len = a->name_length;
+ if (name_len) {
+ name_offset = le16_to_cpu(a->name_offset);
+
+ if (name_offset < min_len || name_offset >= attr_len)
+ return false;
+
+ name_end = name_offset + name_len * sizeof(__le16);
+ if (name_end > attr_len || name_end > mp_offset)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * A normal non-resident attribute moves its name forward when
+ * it is converted to a sparse attribute.
+ */
+ if (!(a->flags & (ATTR_IS_SPARSE | ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK)) &&
+ name_end + 8 > attr_len)
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+
}
static bool ntfs_attr_value_is_valid(struct ntfs_volume *vol,
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ntfs: fix name offset validation in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid
2026-08-06 1:39 [PATCH v2] ntfs: fix name offset validation in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid Hongling Zeng
@ 2026-08-06 2:38 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-08-06 5:19 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hongling Zeng @ 2026-08-06 2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linkinjeon
Cc: Hongling Zeng, hyc.lee, alexandro.calo, ntfs, linux-kernel,
stable
Hi:
Thank you for the review. You're absolutely right on both points:
1. name_length is u8, not __le16 - my mistake.
2. Moving the check outside the if (name_length) block is better as
it covers both named and unnamed attributes.
However, I have a concern about using ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK here.
In ntfs_attr_update_meta() line 3610, the actual conversion check is:
if (sparse && !(a->flags & (ATTR_IS_SPARSE | ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED)))
This uses ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED (0x0001), not ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK (0x00ff).
If a malicious MFT record sets flags = 0x0002:
- Your check would skip (0x0002 & 0x00ff is true)
- But ntfs_attr_update_meta() would still do the forward shift
(0x0002 & 0x0001 is false)
Should we use ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED instead to match the actual conversion
predicate? Or is there another reason for the mask that I'm missing?
Otherwise, your suggested approach of checking:
attr_len - mp_offset < sizeof(a->data.non_resident.compressed_size)
is much cleaner than checking name_end + 8.
在 2026年08月06日 09:39, Hongling Zeng 写道:
> ntfs_attr_update_meta() performs memmove operations on attribute names
> when converting between sparse and non-sparse attributes:
>
> - Converting to sparse shifts the name forward by 8 bytes
> (name_offset + 8)
> - Converting from sparse shifts the name backward by 8 bytes
> (name_offset - 8)
>
> However, the validator does not check that name_offset is within safe
> boundaries for these operations. A malicious MFT record could set
> name_offset such that:
>
> 1. The name is positioned at the very end of a non-sparse attribute.
> Converting to sparse would shift the name forward by 8 bytes,
> writing beyond the attribute boundary.
>
> 2. The name overlaps with the mapping pairs, causing corruption during
> conversion.
>
> Add validation to ensure:
> - For named attributes, name_offset is within valid bounds
> - Name does not extend beyond the attribute or overlap with mapping pairs
> - For non-sparse attributes, name_end + 8 fits within attr_len to allow
> room for the forward shift when becoming sparse
>
> Note: name_offset validation only applies when name_length != 0, as
> unnamed attributes use name_offset = 0 which is valid.
>
> Fixes: 7e2a1c554bc4 ("ntfs: Fix min_len for compressed/sparse attributes in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Read name_length directly as an 8-bit field instead of using
> le16_to_cpu().
> - Restrict the name forward-shift bounds check to the same attribute
> types that can actually be converted by ntfs_attr_update_meta().
> ---
> fs/ntfs/attrib.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
> index d354c3b0fae1..ffd08633970a 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/attrib.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ static bool ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid(const struct attr_record *a)
> u32 attr_len;
> u32 min_len;
> u16 mp_offset;
> + u16 name_offset;
> + u8 name_len;
> + u32 name_end;
>
> attr_len = le32_to_cpu(a->length);
> min_len = offsetof(struct attr_record, data.non_resident.initialized_size) +
> @@ -706,7 +709,35 @@ static bool ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid(const struct attr_record *a)
> return false;
>
> mp_offset = le16_to_cpu(a->data.non_resident.mapping_pairs_offset);
> - return mp_offset >= min_len && mp_offset <= attr_len;
> + if (mp_offset < min_len || mp_offset > attr_len)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Validate name_offset for named attributes.
> + * may be zero for unnamed attributes.
> + */
> + name_len = a->name_length;
> + if (name_len) {
> + name_offset = le16_to_cpu(a->name_offset);
> +
> + if (name_offset < min_len || name_offset >= attr_len)
> + return false;
> +
> + name_end = name_offset + name_len * sizeof(__le16);
> + if (name_end > attr_len || name_end > mp_offset)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * A normal non-resident attribute moves its name forward when
> + * it is converted to a sparse attribute.
> + */
> + if (!(a->flags & (ATTR_IS_SPARSE | ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK)) &&
> + name_end + 8 > attr_len)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +
> }
>
> static bool ntfs_attr_value_is_valid(struct ntfs_volume *vol,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ntfs: fix name offset validation in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid
2026-08-06 2:38 ` Hongling Zeng
@ 2026-08-06 5:19 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2026-08-06 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hongling Zeng
Cc: Hongling Zeng, hyc.lee, alexandro.calo, ntfs, linux-kernel,
stable
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 11:39 AM Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com> wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> Thank you for the review. You're absolutely right on both points:
>
> 1. name_length is u8, not __le16 - my mistake.
>
> 2. Moving the check outside the if (name_length) block is better as
> it covers both named and unnamed attributes.
>
> However, I have a concern about using ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK here.
>
> In ntfs_attr_update_meta() line 3610, the actual conversion check is:
>
> if (sparse && !(a->flags & (ATTR_IS_SPARSE | ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED)))
>
> This uses ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED (0x0001), not ATTR_COMPRESSION_MASK (0x00ff).
>
> If a malicious MFT record sets flags = 0x0002:
> - Your check would skip (0x0002 & 0x00ff is true)
> - But ntfs_attr_update_meta() would still do the forward shift
> (0x0002 & 0x0001 is false)
>
> Should we use ATTR_IS_COMPRESSED instead to match the actual conversion
> predicate? Or is there another reason for the mask that I'm missing?
You're right. Can you send v3 patch after updating it ?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-06 5:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-06 1:39 [PATCH v2] ntfs: fix name offset validation in ntfs_non_resident_attr_value_is_valid Hongling Zeng
2026-08-06 2:38 ` Hongling Zeng
2026-08-06 5:19 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox