The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	puranjay@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	chenl311@chinatelecom.cn, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	kristina.martsenko@arm.com, liaochang1@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:08:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bd09b5b-9830-42b4-ad9e-9ad1e153e564@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729015456.3411143-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

Hi Jinjie,

On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:

> Since commit a70e9f647f50 ("entry: Split generic entry into generic
> exception and syscall entry") split the generic entry into generic irq
> entry and generic syscall entry, it is time to convert arm64 to use
> the generic irq entry. And ARM64 will be completely converted to generic
> entry in the upcoming patch series.
Note : I had to manually cherry-pick a70e9f647f50 when pulling the series
on top of the Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch, but there might be
something I'm missing here.
>
> The main convert steps are as follows:
> - Split generic entry into generic irq entry and generic syscall to
>    make the single patch more concentrated in switching to one thing.
> - Make arm64 easier to use irqentry_enter/exit().
> - Make arm64 closer to the PREEMPT_DYNAMIC code of generic entry.
> - Switch to generic irq entry.

I reviewed the whole series and as expected it looks good ! Just a few nits
here and there and some clarifications that I think could be useful.

I'm not sure about the generic implementation of 
`arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched()`
in patch 5, I would be tempted to move it to patch 7. I detail my 
thoughts more
on the relevant patches, but I might be wrong and that feels like details :
I don't think the code itself has issues.
> It was tested ok with following test cases on QEMU virt platform:
>   - Perf tests.
>   - Different `dynamic preempt` mode switch.
>   - Pseudo NMI tests.
>   - Stress-ng CPU stress test.
>   - MTE test case in Documentation/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst
>     and all test cases in tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/*.
>
> The test QEMU configuration is as follows:
>
> 	qemu-system-aarch64 \
> 		-M virt,gic-version=3,virtualization=on,mte=on \
> 		-cpu max,pauth-impdef=on \
> 		-kernel Image \
> 		-smp 8,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=2 \
> 		-m 512m \
> 		-nographic \
> 		-no-reboot \
> 		-device virtio-rng-pci \
> 		-append "root=/dev/vda rw console=ttyAMA0 kgdboc=ttyAMA0,115200 \
> 			earlycon preempt=voluntary irqchip.gicv3_pseudo_nmi=1" \
> 		-drive if=none,file=images/rootfs.ext4,format=raw,id=hd0 \
> 		-device virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 \
>
I'll spend some time testing the series now, specifically given patch 6's
changes, but other than that everything I saw made sense and didn't look
like it would be of concern to me.

Thanks,
Ada

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-05 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29  1:54 [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:05   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  2:31     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 2/7] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  2:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:01       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-12 11:01   ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 3/7] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 4/7] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  6:26     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-06  6:39     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:02       ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-11 16:02   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14  8:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:13   ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14  9:31     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29  1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 7/7] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07   ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06  6:59     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:08 ` Ada Couprie Diaz [this message]
2025-08-06  8:11   ` [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:03     ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14  9:37       ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14  9:39   ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6bd09b5b-9830-42b4-ad9e-9ad1e153e564@arm.com \
    --to=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox