From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: mbenes@suse.cz, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, leitao@debian.org,
ardb@kernel.org, liaochang1@huawei.com,
kristina.martsenko@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
chenl311@chinatelecom.cn, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode()
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:07:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbe56865-392e-4705-b841-5612aecd016b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250729015456.3411143-7-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The arm64 entry code only preempts a kernel context upon a return from
> a regular IRQ exception. The generic entry code may preempt a kernel
> context for any exception return where irqentry_exit() is used, and so
> may preempt other exceptions such as faults.
>
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, align
> arm64 with the generic behaviour by calling
> arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() from exit_to_kernel_mode(). To make this
> possible, arm64_preempt_schedule_irq()
> and dynamic/raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched() are moved earlier in
> the file, with no changes.
>
> As Mark pointed out, this change will have the following 2 key impact:
>
> - " We'll preempt even without taking a "real" interrupt. That
> shouldn't result in preemption that wasn't possible before,
> but it does change the probability of preempting at certain points,
> and might have a performance impact, so probably warrants a
> benchmark."
>
> - " We will not preempt when taking interrupts from a region of kernel
> code where IRQs are enabled but RCU is not watching, matching the
> behaviour of the generic entry code.
>
> This has the potential to introduce livelock if we can ever have a
> screaming interrupt in such a region, so we'll need to go figure out
> whether that's actually a problem.
>
> Having this as a separate patch will make it easier to test/bisect
> for that specifically."
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 1:54 [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:05 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 2/7] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:01 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-12 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 3/7] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 4/7] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:26 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-06 6:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 8:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz [this message]
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 7/7] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:59 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:08 ` [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 8:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:03 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 9:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbe56865-392e-4705-b841-5612aecd016b@arm.com \
--to=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox