From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb75bd724f45bca8371235fd51132e987fb0f8a.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5692d7fbc3d4bd2ac624c82a77f642c36a2cf04e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 16:55 +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-04 at 13:05 +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In some virtualized environments, including s390 paged memory guests,
> > IOTLB flushes are used to update IOMMU shadow tables. Due to this, they
> > are much more expensive than in typical bare metal environments or
> > non-paged s390 guests. In addition they may parallelize more poorly in
> > virtualized environments. This changes the trade off for flushing IOVAs
> > such that minimizing the number of IOTLB flushes trumps any benefit of
> > cheaper queuing operations or increased paralellism.
> >
> > In this scenario per-CPU flush queues pose several problems. Firstly
> > per-CPU memory is often quite limited prohibiting larger queues.
> > Secondly collecting IOVAs per-CPU but flushing via a global timeout
> > reduces the number of IOVAs flushed for each timeout especially on s390
> > where PCI interrupts may not be bound to a specific CPU.
> >
> > Thus let's introduce a single flush queue mode IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_SQ that
> > reuses the same queue logic but only allocates a single global queue
> > allowing larger batches of IOVAs to be freed at once and with larger
> > timeouts. This is to allow the common IOVA flushing code to more closely
> > resemble the global flush behavior used on s390's previous internal DMA
> > API implementation.
> >
> > As we now support two different variants of flush queues rename the
> > existing __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ to __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_LAZY to indicate
> > the general case of having a flush queue and introduce separate
> > __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_PERCPU_Q and __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_SINGLE_Q bits to
> > indicate the two queue variants.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/3e402947-61f9-b7e8-1414-fde006257b6f@arm.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - Rename __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ to __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_LAZY to make it more clear
> > that this bit indicates flush queue use independent of the exact queuing
> > strategy
>
---8<---
>
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < IOVA_FQ_SIZE; i++)
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fq->entries[i].freelist);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + pr_warn("iova flush queue initialization failed\n");
> > + return rc;
> > }
> >
> ---8<---
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
> > @@ -2896,10 +2900,10 @@ static int iommu_change_dev_def_domain(struct iommu_group *group,
> > }
> >
> > /* We can bring up a flush queue without tearing down the domain */
> > - if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ && prev_dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) {
> > + if (!!(type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_LAZY) && prev_dom->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA) {
> > ret = iommu_dma_init_fq(prev_dom);
> > if (!ret)
> > - prev_dom->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ;
> > + prev_dom->type = type;
>
> Here domain->type is set only after calling iommu_dma_init_fq().
Actually I think even in the current code the above and the similar
code in iommu.c isn't ideal. When going from DMA to DMA-FQ with a bound
driver the flush queue is used from the moment that WRITE_ONCE(cookie-
>fq_domain, domain) executes in iommu_dma_init_fq() so there is a
window where the flush queue is already used but domain->type is still
DMA. By adding a type parameter to iommu_dma_init_fq() we can set
domain->type before the WRITE_ONCE() and thus close this window and it
even makes the callsites of iommu_dma_init_fq() simpler.
>
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 12:05 [PATCH v4 0/7] iommu/dma: s390 DMA API conversion and optimized IOTLB flushing Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] s390/ism: Set DMA coherent mask Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-17 15:09 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iommu: Allow .iotlb_sync_map to fail and handle s390's -ENOMEM return Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-05 7:15 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-17 15:10 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-19 11:31 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] s390/pci: prepare is_passed_through() for dma-iommu Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-17 15:10 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-17 15:09 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-19 11:03 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-19 15:59 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-19 16:04 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-19 16:12 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-19 16:33 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-19 16:40 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-19 15:55 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-19 16:16 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu/dma: Enable variable queue size and use larger single queue Niklas Schnelle
2023-01-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] iommu/dma: Add IOMMU op to choose lazy domain type Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cb75bd724f45bca8371235fd51132e987fb0f8a.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox