* [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode. @ 2025-05-08 7:47 yohan.joung 2025-05-08 7:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry yohan.joung 2025-05-08 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode Chao Yu 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: yohan.joung @ 2025-05-08 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jaegeuk, chao, daehojeong Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, pilhyun.kim, yohan.joung In LFS mode, the previous segment cannot use invalid blocks, so the remaining blocks from the next_blkoff of the current segment to the end of the section are calculated. Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.joung@sk.com> --- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h index 03c0f59be5a8..5777b385e7d2 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ static inline void sanity_check_seg_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, #define CAP_SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi) \ (SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi) - \ BLKS_TO_SEGS(sbi, (sbi)->unusable_blocks_per_sec)) +#define GET_START_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, segno) \ + (rounddown(segno, SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi))) #define GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno) \ (((segno) == -1) ? -1 : (segno) / SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi)) #define GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno) \ @@ -582,8 +584,14 @@ static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, if (unlikely(segno == NULL_SEGNO)) return false; - left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - - get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true); + if (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && __is_large_section(sbi)) { + left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - + SEGS_TO_BLKS(sbi, (segno - GET_START_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, segno))) - + CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->next_blkoff; + } else { + left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - + get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true); + } blocks = i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA ? data_blocks : node_blocks; if (blocks > left_blocks) @@ -596,8 +604,15 @@ static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, if (unlikely(segno == NULL_SEGNO)) return false; - left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - - get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true); + if (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi) && __is_large_section(sbi)) { + left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - + SEGS_TO_BLKS(sbi, (segno - GET_START_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, segno))) - + CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA)->next_blkoff; + } else { + left_blocks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) - + get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true); + } + if (dent_blocks > left_blocks) return false; return true; -- 2.33.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry 2025-05-08 7:47 [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode yohan.joung @ 2025-05-08 7:47 ` yohan.joung 2025-05-08 9:38 ` Chao Yu 2025-05-08 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode Chao Yu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: yohan.joung @ 2025-05-08 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jaegeuk, chao, daehojeong Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, pilhyun.kim, yohan.joung when performing buffered writes in a large section, overhead is incurred due to the iteration through ckpt_valid_blocks within the section. when SEGS_PER_SEC is 128, this overhead accounts for 20% within the f2fs_write_single_data_page routine. as the size of the section increases, the overhead also grows. to handle this problem ckpt_valid_blocks is added within the section entries. Test insmod null_blk.ko nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=1 submit_queues=8 hw_queue_depth=64 max_sectors=512 bs=4096 memory_backed=1 make_f2fs /dev/block/nullb0 make_f2fs -s 128 /dev/block/nullb0 fio --bs=512k --size=1536M --rw=write --name=1 --filename=/mnt/test_dir/seq_write --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=64 --end_fsync=1 before SEGS_PER_SEC 1 2556MiB/s SEGS_PER_SEC 128 2145MiB/s after SEGS_PER_SEC 1 2556MiB/s SEGS_PER_SEC 128 2556MiB/s Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.joung@sk.com> --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- fs/f2fs/segment.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 671bc5a8fd4a..7a53f2d8a474 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment. */ static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se, - block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) + unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) { bool exist; #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS @@ -2492,15 +2492,22 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_ent f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->discard_map)) sbi->discard_blks++; - if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); +#endif + if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1; + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1; + } } return del; } static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se, - block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) + unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) { bool exist; #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS @@ -2532,13 +2539,23 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry * SSR should never reuse block which is checkpointed * or newly invalidated. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); +#endif if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) { - if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) + if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { se->ckpt_valid_blocks++; + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks++; + } } - if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) + if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del; + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks += del; + } return del; } @@ -2569,9 +2586,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del) /* Update valid block bitmap */ if (del > 0) { - del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del); + del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del); } else { - del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del); + del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del); } __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno); @@ -4700,12 +4717,16 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) &sit_in_journal(journal, offset)); check_block_count(sbi, segno, &sit_in_journal(journal, offset)); + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); } else { sit_offset = SIT_ENTRY_OFFSET(sit_i, segno); seg_info_to_raw_sit(se, &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]); check_block_count(sbi, segno, &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]); + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); } __clear_bit(segno, bitmap); @@ -5029,6 +5050,12 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) } up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem); + /* update ckpt_ckpt_valid_block */ + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) { + for (unsigned int segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi)) + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); + } + if (err) return err; diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h index 5777b385e7d2..ebc90d3cb57c 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct seg_entry { struct sec_entry { unsigned int valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks in a section */ + unsigned int ckpt_valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks last cp in a section */ }; #define MAX_SKIP_GC_COUNT 16 @@ -347,22 +348,52 @@ static inline unsigned int get_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, static inline unsigned int get_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno, bool use_section) { - if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) { - unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); - unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); - unsigned int blocks = 0; - int i; + if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) + return get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; + else + return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; +} + +static inline void set_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, + unsigned int segno) +{ + unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); + unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); + unsigned int blocks = 0; + int i; - for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { - struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); + for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); - blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; - } - return blocks; + blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; } - return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks = blocks; } +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS +static inline void sanity_check_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, + unsigned int segno) +{ + unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); + unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); + unsigned int blocks = 0; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); + + blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; + } + + if (blocks != get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks) { + f2fs_err(sbi, + "Inconsistent ckpt valid blocks: " + "seg entry(%d) vs sec entry(%d) at secno %d", + blocks, get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks, secno); + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); + } +} +#endif static inline void seg_info_from_raw_sit(struct seg_entry *se, struct f2fs_sit_entry *rs) { -- 2.33.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry 2025-05-08 7:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry yohan.joung @ 2025-05-08 9:38 ` Chao Yu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2025-05-08 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yohan.joung, jaegeuk, daehojeong Cc: chao, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, pilhyun.kim On 5/8/25 15:47, yohan.joung wrote: > when performing buffered writes in a large section, > overhead is incurred due to the iteration through > ckpt_valid_blocks within the section. > when SEGS_PER_SEC is 128, this overhead accounts for 20% within > the f2fs_write_single_data_page routine. > as the size of the section increases, the overhead also grows. > to handle this problem ckpt_valid_blocks is > added within the section entries. > > Test > insmod null_blk.ko nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=1 submit_queues=8 > hw_queue_depth=64 max_sectors=512 bs=4096 memory_backed=1 > make_f2fs /dev/block/nullb0 > make_f2fs -s 128 /dev/block/nullb0 > fio --bs=512k --size=1536M --rw=write --name=1 > --filename=/mnt/test_dir/seq_write > --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=64 --end_fsync=1 > > before > SEGS_PER_SEC 1 > 2556MiB/s > SEGS_PER_SEC 128 > 2145MiB/s > > after > SEGS_PER_SEC 1 > 2556MiB/s > SEGS_PER_SEC 128 > 2556MiB/s > > Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.joung@sk.com> > --- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > fs/f2fs/segment.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index 671bc5a8fd4a..7a53f2d8a474 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, > * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment. > */ > static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se, > - block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) > + unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) > { > bool exist; > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS > @@ -2492,15 +2492,22 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_ent > f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, se->discard_map)) > sbi->discard_blks++; > > - if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) > +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); > +#endif > + if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { > se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1; > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1; > + } > } > > return del; > } > > static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry *se, > - block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) > + unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del) > { > bool exist; > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS > @@ -2532,13 +2539,23 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry > * SSR should never reuse block which is checkpointed > * or newly invalidated. > */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); > +#endif How about doing sanity check after ckpt_valid_blocks update? > if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) { > - if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) > + if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { > se->ckpt_valid_blocks++; > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks++; > + } > } > > - if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) > + if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) { > se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del; > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks += del; > + } > > return del; > } > @@ -2569,9 +2586,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del) > > /* Update valid block bitmap */ > if (del > 0) { > - del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del); > + del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del); > } else { > - del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del); > + del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, offset, del); > } > > __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno); > @@ -4700,12 +4717,16 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) > &sit_in_journal(journal, offset)); > check_block_count(sbi, segno, > &sit_in_journal(journal, offset)); > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); > } else { > sit_offset = SIT_ENTRY_OFFSET(sit_i, segno); > seg_info_to_raw_sit(se, > &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]); > check_block_count(sbi, segno, > &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]); > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) > + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); > } Move here for cleanup? if (__is_large_section(sbi)) set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); How about adding sanity check here as well? > > __clear_bit(segno, bitmap); > @@ -5029,6 +5050,12 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > } > up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem); > > + /* update ckpt_ckpt_valid_block */ > + if (__is_large_section(sbi)) { > + for (unsigned int segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi)) Let's keep the style of defining variable outside of 'for' statement. > + set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno); > + } do sanity check here? > + > if (err) > return err; > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h > index 5777b385e7d2..ebc90d3cb57c 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h > @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct seg_entry { > > struct sec_entry { > unsigned int valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks in a section */ > + unsigned int ckpt_valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks last cp in a section */ > }; > > #define MAX_SKIP_GC_COUNT 16 > @@ -347,22 +348,52 @@ static inline unsigned int get_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > static inline unsigned int get_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > unsigned int segno, bool use_section) > { > - if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) { > - unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); > - unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); > - unsigned int blocks = 0; > - int i; > + if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) > + return get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; > + else > + return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; > +} > + > +static inline void set_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > + unsigned int segno) > +{ > + unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); > + unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); > + unsigned int blocks = 0; > + int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { > - struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); > + for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { > + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); > > - blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; > - } > - return blocks; > + blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; > } > - return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks; > + get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks = blocks; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS > +static inline void sanity_check_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > + unsigned int segno) > +{ > + unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno); > + unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno); > + unsigned int blocks = 0; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) { > + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno); > + > + blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks; > + } > + > + if (blocks != get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks) { > + f2fs_err(sbi, > + "Inconsistent ckpt valid blocks: " > + "seg entry(%d) vs sec entry(%d) at secno %d", > + blocks, get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks, secno); > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1); > + } > +} > +#endif #else static inline void sanity_check_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno) { } #endif Then we don't need to cover sanity_check_valid_blocks() invoking w/ CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS. Thanks, > static inline void seg_info_from_raw_sit(struct seg_entry *se, > struct f2fs_sit_entry *rs) > { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode. 2025-05-08 7:47 [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode yohan.joung 2025-05-08 7:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry yohan.joung @ 2025-05-08 9:21 ` Chao Yu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2025-05-08 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yohan.joung, jaegeuk, daehojeong Cc: chao, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel, pilhyun.kim On 5/8/25 15:47, yohan.joung wrote: > In LFS mode, the previous segment cannot use invalid blocks, > so the remaining blocks from the next_blkoff of the current segment > to the end of the section are calculated. > > Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.joung@sk.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-08 9:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-05-08 7:47 [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode yohan.joung 2025-05-08 7:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: add ckpt_valid_blocks to the section entry yohan.joung 2025-05-08 9:38 ` Chao Yu 2025-05-08 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: add a method for calculating the remaining blocks in the current segment in LFS mode Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox