The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] s390/ipl: Mark store_status as __noreturn
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7AD8A2F3-96E1-4C72-8E06-55BA50C9CFF1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110150635.15528B2f-hca@linux.ibm.com>

On 10. Nov 2025, at 16:06, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 02:27:51PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> store_status() performs a tail call (BR_EX) to the function passed as
>> the first parameter and does not return. Annotate the declaration with
>> the __noreturn attribute to improve compiler optimizations.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> This doesn't make any sense. If a function is called, which calls
> another one with a tail call, then _of course_ it looks to the caller
> like the function returned.

Hm, I must have misunderstood this comment from
arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c:

/*
 * ...
 *  The call to store_status() will not return.
 */
store_status(__do_machine_kdump, image);


      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-11  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 13:27 [PATCH 1/5] s390/ipl: Mark store_status as __noreturn Thorsten Blum
2025-11-10 13:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/kdump: Mark __machine_kdump " Thorsten Blum
2025-11-10 13:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/kdump: Mark __do_machine_kexec " Thorsten Blum
2025-11-10 13:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] s390/kdump: Mark __machine_kexec " Thorsten Blum
2025-11-10 13:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/kdump: Mark __do_machine_kdump " Thorsten Blum
2025-11-10 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] s390/ipl: Mark store_status " Heiko Carstens
2025-11-11  7:00   ` Thorsten Blum [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7AD8A2F3-96E1-4C72-8E06-55BA50C9CFF1@linux.dev \
    --to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox