public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>, Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	jingoohan1@gmail.com, thomas.richard@bootlin.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Configure max payload size on host init
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:08:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85643fe4-c7df-4d64-e852-60b66892470a@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aACoEpueUHBLjgbb@ryzen>

在 2025/04/17 星期四 15:04, Niklas Cassel 写道:
> Hello Hans,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:26PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> The RK3588's PCIe controller defaults to a 128-byte max payload size,
>> but its hardware capability actually supports 256 bytes. This results
>> in suboptimal performance with devices that support larger payloads.
> 
> Patch looks good to me, but please always reference the TRM when you can.
> 
> Before this patch:
> 		DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes
> 		DevCtl: MaxPayload 128 bytes
> 
> 
> As per rk3588 TRM, section "11.4.3.8 DSP_PCIE_CAP Detail Registers Description"
> 
> DevCap is per the register description of DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG,
> field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE.
> Which claims that the value after reset is 0x1 (256B).
> 
> DevCtl is per the register description of
> DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CONTROL_DEVICE_STATUS, field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS.
> Which claims that the reset value is 0x0 (128B).
> 
> Both of these match the values above.
> 
> As per the description of PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS:
> "Permissible values that
> can be programmed are indicated by the Max_Payload_Size
> Supported field (PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE) in the Device
> Capabilities (DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG) register (for more
> details, see section 7.5.3.3 of PCI Express Base Specification)."
> 
> So your patch looks good.
> 
> I guess I'm mostly surprised that the e.g. pci_configure_mps() does not
> already set DevCtl to the max(DevCap.MPS of the host, DevCap.MPS of the
> endpoint).
> 
> Apparently pci_configure_mps() only decreases MPS from the reset values?
> It never increases it?
> 

Actually it does:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt#L4757

> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-17  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 15:19 [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Configure max payload size on host init Hans Zhang
2025-04-16 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-17  2:19   ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17  6:01     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  6:47       ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17  6:53         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  7:04 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  7:08   ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2025-04-17  7:22     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  7:25       ` Shawn Lin
2025-04-17  7:48         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  8:07           ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17  8:39             ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17  9:48               ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17  9:54                 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 16:52               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-18 12:33                 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-18 14:55                   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-18 16:21                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-18 17:21                     ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-21 14:53                       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-04-21 15:59                         ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-21 14:48               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85643fe4-c7df-4d64-e852-60b66892470a@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox