From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
jingoohan1@gmail.com, thomas.richard@bootlin.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Configure max payload size on host init
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:25:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca283065-a48c-3b39-e70d-03d4c6c8a956@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aACsJPkSDOHbRAJM@ryzen>
在 2025/04/17 星期四 15:22, Niklas Cassel 写道:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:08:34PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> 在 2025/04/17 星期四 15:04, Niklas Cassel 写道:
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:19:26PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>>>> The RK3588's PCIe controller defaults to a 128-byte max payload size,
>>>> but its hardware capability actually supports 256 bytes. This results
>>>> in suboptimal performance with devices that support larger payloads.
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me, but please always reference the TRM when you can.
>>>
>>> Before this patch:
>>> DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes
>>> DevCtl: MaxPayload 128 bytes
>>>
>>>
>>> As per rk3588 TRM, section "11.4.3.8 DSP_PCIE_CAP Detail Registers Description"
>>>
>>> DevCap is per the register description of DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG,
>>> field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE.
>>> Which claims that the value after reset is 0x1 (256B).
>>>
>>> DevCtl is per the register description of
>>> DSP_PCIE_CAP_DEVICE_CONTROL_DEVICE_STATUS, field PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS.
>>> Which claims that the reset value is 0x0 (128B).
>>>
>>> Both of these match the values above.
>>>
>>> As per the description of PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE_CS:
>>> "Permissible values that
>>> can be programmed are indicated by the Max_Payload_Size
>>> Supported field (PCIE_CAP_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE) in the Device
>>> Capabilities (DEVICE_CAPABILITIES_REG) register (for more
>>> details, see section 7.5.3.3 of PCI Express Base Specification)."
>>>
>>> So your patch looks good.
>>>
>>> I guess I'm mostly surprised that the e.g. pci_configure_mps() does not
>>> already set DevCtl to the max(DevCap.MPS of the host, DevCap.MPS of the
>>> endpoint).
>>>
>>> Apparently pci_configure_mps() only decreases MPS from the reset values?
>>> It never increases it?
>>>
>>
>> Actually it does:
>>
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt#L4757
>
> If that is the case, then explain the before/after with Hans lspci output here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/bb40385c-6839-484c-90b2-d6c7ecb95ba9@163.com/
>
> His patch changes the default value of DevCtl.MPS (from 128B to 256B), but if
> pci_configure_mps() can bump DevCtl.MPS to a higher value, his patch should not
> be needed, since the EP (an NVMe SSD in his case) has DevCap.MPS 512B, and the
> RC itself has DevCap.MPS 256B.
>
> Seems like we are missing something here.
So Hans, could you please help set pci=pcie_bus_safe or
pci=pcie_bus_perf in your cmdline, and see how lspci dump different
without your patch?
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 15:19 [PATCH] PCI: dw-rockchip: Configure max payload size on host init Hans Zhang
2025-04-16 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-17 2:19 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17 6:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 6:47 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17 6:53 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 7:04 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 7:08 ` Shawn Lin
2025-04-17 7:22 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 7:25 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2025-04-17 7:48 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 8:07 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17 8:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 9:48 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-17 9:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-17 16:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-18 12:33 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-18 14:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-18 16:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-18 17:21 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-21 14:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-04-21 15:59 ` Hans Zhang
2025-04-21 14:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca283065-a48c-3b39-e70d-03d4c6c8a956@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox