From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pasi Vaananen <pvaanane@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: further issues with MGA G200 graphics chipset
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:18:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8650b05f-4c13-4897-af4e-0749cdfd0942@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMwc25o=3EHkJYG=qYrgtmmB9raqbsaif6hOKLi0awG-ydWZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/23/2026 2:02 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 5:42 AM Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/23/2026 12:22 PM, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>>> On 23/04/2026 18:35, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>>> On 4/23/2026 12:44 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.04.26 um 01:55 schrieb Jacob Keller:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> <snip>>>> I'm also curious if its possible to stop polling for so
>>> long with udelay
>>>>>> in the i2c logic somehow? I am not very familiar with i2c, but it is
>>>>>> frustrating that this driver is causing yet another stall that is
>>>>>> impacting timing sensitive data. Even if in this case its due to a
>>>>>> faulty cable.. it is frustrating that such result causes the PTP
>>>>>> failures. Would switching to WQ_UNBOUND be helpful here at all?
>>>>>
>>>>> Try Dave's suggestion to avoid polling. The driver won't be able to
>>>>> detect changes to the connector status, though.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's fine. I don't think we're even using the device. It looks like it
>>>> might only be in use for BMC, and the VGA connection isn't actually
>>>> physically available, so there are no changes to detect.
>>>>
>>>> Is this polling really only to detect when VGA is enabled? Would it make
>>>> sense to only poll on platforms which actually *have* that VGA
>>> connection?
>>>>
>>> Polling was introduced with https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/
>>> series/131977/
>>>
>>> The driver needs to know if a VGA monitor is connected or not, to
>>> provide the right available resolutions to the userspace.
>>> Otherwise you can set a high resolution that works from the BMC, but
>>> then connecting a VGA monitor will not work, as the driver won't notice
>>> that something has been connected.
>>>
>>> The mgag200 doesn't have an IRQ or a register to check if something is
>>> connected on the VGA port, so the driver uses the i2c and tries to read
>>> the EDID.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there is no way to know reliably if a VGA connector is
>>> present. It's possible to disable polling on some machines using DMI
>>> quirks, but I don't think this approach will scale.
>>>
>>
>> Timing sensitive setups like mine must have system admins who know to
>> manually disable mgag200 or disable polling. Many users won't be aware
>> of this. If the polling were not intrusive, this would not be an issue.
>> But....
>>
>> Faulty hardware (perhaps just a cheap pull down resistor on the VGA
>> connection as Dave Airlie suggests) means that any such affected
>> platform has a polling routine that causes significant issues on any
>> timing sensitive applications.
>
> We could write a patch to just say if we see 10 bogus EDID polls we
> just give up and loudly say in the logs.
>
That would certainly be a better situation for me...
> This might break some crash-cart plugins in some data centers though,
> I don't think we have contracts in Matrox or the server vendors who
> make the hw to say how they recommend finding this info.
>
But I could see this being a problem for data centers who previously saw
"no issue" and now see "this device is causing a problem", especially if
that problem is really non-existent?
> It might be in ACPI or dmidecodes.
>
I can try checking if anything obvious shows up in dmidecodes for the
device.
> Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 23:55 further issues with MGA G200 graphics chipset Jacob Keller
2026-04-23 0:05 ` David Airlie
2026-04-23 21:39 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-23 7:44 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-04-23 16:35 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-23 19:22 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2026-04-23 19:42 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-23 21:02 ` David Airlie
2026-04-23 21:18 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2026-04-24 6:16 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-04-24 6:20 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-04-24 7:36 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2026-04-24 7:47 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-04-24 23:29 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-27 12:14 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-04-27 22:53 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-27 23:32 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-28 19:12 ` stuart hayes
2026-04-28 21:07 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-29 6:40 ` Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8650b05f-4c13-4897-af4e-0749cdfd0942@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jfalempe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvaanane@redhat.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox