public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@garzik.org>,
	"Ayaz Abdulla" <aabdulla@nvidia.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: regression caused by: genirq: do not leave interupts enabled on free_irq
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:06:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86802c440804150106p42b2befax349c24b6ff476238@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080415004400.bb941191.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:48:43 -0700 "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Eric W. Biederman
>  > >  <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > >  On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:17 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>  > >  >  > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > >  >  > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>  > >  >  > >  > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>  > >  >  > >  >  > last week found:
>  > >  >  > >  >  > after latest kernel kexec RHEL 5.1 or other stack kernel, the nvidia
>  > >  >  > >  >  > forcedeth doesn't work anymore.
>  > >  >  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > >  >  > I stared at forcedeth.c two days. and revert every patches about that
>  > >  >  > >  >  > doesn't help.
>  > >  >  > >  >
>  > >  >  > >  >  So forcedeth does not come up again, when you kexec from linus.git
>  > >  >  > >  >  into an older distro kernel. Or is it the other way round ?
>  > >  >  > >  RHEL 5.1 kexec RHEL 5.1 : works
>  > >  >  > >  RHEL 5.1 kexec linus kernel: works
>  > >  >  > >  linus (after -rc2) kexec linus tree: works:
>  > >  >  > >  linus  (after -rc2) kexec RHEL 5.1 : forcedeth will not come up
>  > >  >  > >  linus ( before -rc2 include rc2) kexec RHEL 5.1 works
>  > >  >  > >
>  > >  >  > the forcedeth can not get IP address...
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  Sounds like you are not getting any interrupts when you receive a
>  > >  >  packet.  (i.e. The interrupt line is staying disabled).
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  Is MSI an option here?  I'm wondering if we disable the MSI and
>  > >  >  something is not enabling it.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  after
>  > >  setpci -s 0x00:08.0 0x60.b=0xfe
>  > >
>  > >  the eth0 can get ip address with ifup eth0.
>  >
>  > it is RHEL 5.1 problem...with msi.
>  >
>  > somehow msi entry msi_attrib_maskbit=is_mask_bit_support always get
>  > 0...., and use msi_irq_wo_maskbit_type instead of
>  > msi_irq_w_maskbit_type
>  >
>  > so when load that directly without kexec
>  > that 0x60 always to 0x00.
>  >
>  > and this time kernel after 2.6.25-rc2 ( not included) really shutdown
>  > the msi with 0xff the all maskbit...
>  >
>
>  So... where did this end up?   It's a post-2.6.24 regression, isn't it?

between 2.6.25-rc2 and 2.6.25-rc3 by one patch from Thomas regarding
genirq to solve one long standing spurious problem...
looks like the irq is ioapic or pic, right?

YH

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-15  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11  6:13 regression caused by: genirq: do not leave interupts enabled on free_irq Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11  7:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-11  7:14   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11  7:17     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11  7:30       ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-11  8:40         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 15:59           ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-04-11 10:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-11 15:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 16:23             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 18:22         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 19:48           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15  7:44             ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-15  8:03               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15  8:17                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-15  8:23                   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-15  8:06               ` Yinghai Lu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86802c440804150106p42b2befax349c24b6ff476238@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aabdulla@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox