From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
grayhat@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:56:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86jyq6aq8g.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86mrv2arf2.wl-maz@kernel.org>
[+ Shen, who privately reported this with a 7 hour lead...]
On Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:31:13 +0100,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:44:04 +0100,
> Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > A vCPU in L2 caches its shadow S2 MMU in vcpu->arch.hw_mmu.
> > kvm_vcpu_init_nested() can grow kvm->arch.nested_mmus while initialising
> > another vCPU: it copies the MMUs, publishes the new allocation, and frees
> > the old one. It updates pgt->mmu back-pointers, but not hw_mmu, leaving
> > the first vCPU with a pointer to freed memory. hw_mmu cannot be fixed up
> > the same way: a running vCPU reads it without holding mmu_lock. Copying
> > also duplicates the MMU's refcount, leaving the live copy permanently
> > elevated.
> >
> > KASAN reports this as a slab-use-after-free in kvm_handle_guest_abort().
> >
> > Make nested_mmus a pointer table and allocate each MMU separately.
> > Growing the table now moves only pointer entries, preserving cached
> > hw_mmu pointers, pgt->mmu back-pointers, and each MMU's refcount. Fully
> > initialise new MMUs before publishing the table and its size under
> > mmu_lock.
> >
> > The old failure path passed uninitialised entries to
> > kvm_free_stage2_pgd(), which needs mmu->arch. Use an allocation helper
> > that returns only fully initialised MMUs, so error cleanup frees only
> > completed objects; kvm_init_stage2_mmu() unwinds a failed initialisation.
>
> I like the approach, but this is making things a bit more complicated
> than they should really be IMO.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 4f128f8e1aaa ("KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> > Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Tested on an arm64 KASAN kernel under QEMU TCG with EL2 emulation
> > (-machine virt,virtualization=on -cpu max, kvm-arm.mode=nested): the
> > selftest in patch 2 reports the slab-use-after-free without this patch
> > and passes with it.
> >
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +-
> > arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index bae2c4f92ef5..f587b01039f9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -319,10 +319,10 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> > u64 fgu[__NR_FGT_GROUP_IDS__];
> >
> > /*
> > - * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual
> > - * VMID.
> > + * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual VMID.
> > + * MMUs are individually allocated to keep their addresses stable.
> > */
> > - struct kvm_s2_mmu *nested_mmus;
> > + struct kvm_s2_mmu **nested_mmus;
> > size_t nested_mmus_size;
> > int nested_mmus_next;
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> > index dfb96edbdc43..af804a5ddca7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/kvm.h>
> > #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> >
> > @@ -66,11 +67,36 @@ static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> > return kvm_init_stage2_mmu(kvm, mmu, kvm_get_pa_bits(kvm));
> > }
> >
> > +static struct kvm_s2_mmu *alloc_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mmu = kzalloc_obj(*mmu, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > + if (!mmu)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, mmu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + /* kvm_init_stage2_mmu() frees its internal allocations on error */
> > + kfree(mmu);
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return mmu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> > +{
> > + kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> > + kfree(mmu);
> > +}
> > +
> > int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> > - struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
> > - int num_mmus, ret = 0;
> > + struct kvm_s2_mmu **tmp;
> > + int i, num_mmus, ret = 0;
> >
> > if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features) &&
> > !cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1))
> > @@ -96,38 +122,48 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > if (!tmp)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Populate new slots before publishing: table walkers hold
> > + * mmu_lock and iterate up to nested_mmus_size.
> > + */
> > + for (i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i < num_mmus; i++) {
> > + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = alloc_nested_s2_mmu(kvm);
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR(mmu)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(mmu);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tmp[i] = mmu;
> > + }
>
> You now are allocating each s2_mmu individually. But you know you want
> at most S2_MMU_PER_VCPU structures, and not any extra ones. So you
> could allocate one block for the current vcpu, and let the next guy
> allocate its own quota.
>
> The other thing is that reallocating the pointer array isn't great. It
> adds complexity, and makes everything more fragile than it should be.
>
> See the hack below that seems to work OK.
>
> M.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 81d359ac7af14..65a1305c4a749 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual
> * VMID.
> */
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *nested_mmus;
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu **nested_mmus;
> size_t nested_mmus_size;
> int nested_mmus_next;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> index 012d711034d17..d21be647ac571 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline u64 translate_ttbr0_el2_to_ttbr0_el1(u64 ttbr0)
>
> extern bool forward_smc_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern bool forward_debug_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -extern void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
> +extern int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
> extern int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern void kvm_init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
> extern struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 9a6c72a186727..ae27ccc37b330 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,9 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> #endif
>
> - kvm_init_nested(kvm);
> + ret = kvm_init_nested(kvm);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> ret = kvm_share_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index dfb96edbdc43c..e7a066a41b552 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -44,11 +44,15 @@ struct vncr_tlb {
> */
> #define S2_MMU_PER_VCPU 2
>
> -void kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> +int kvm_init_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
> + kvm->arch.nested_mmus = kvmalloc_array(KVM_MAX_VCPUS * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU,
> + sizeof(struct s2_mmu *),
> + GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = 0;
> atomic_set(&kvm->arch.vncr_map_count, 0);
> +
> + return kvm->arch.nested_mmus ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> @@ -69,8 +73,7 @@ static int init_nested_s2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
> - int num_mmus, ret = 0;
> + int num_mmus;
>
> if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features) &&
> !cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1))
> @@ -92,42 +95,34 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> num_mmus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) * S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
>
> if (num_mmus > kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {
> - tmp = kvcalloc(num_mmus, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + tmp = kvcalloc(S2_MMU_PER_VCPU, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> if (!tmp)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + for (int i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
> + ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
>
> - if (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size) {
> - memcpy(tmp, kvm->arch.nested_mmus,
> - size_mul(sizeof(*tmp), kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size));
> + if (ret) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
> + kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&tmp[i]);
>
> - for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++)
> - tmp[i].pgt->mmu = &tmp[i];
> + kvfree(tmp);
> + free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
> + vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> + guard(write_lock)(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> - swap(kvm->arch.nested_mmus, tmp);
> + for (int i = 0; i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
> + kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size] = &tmp[i];
>
> - write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> -
> - kvfree(tmp);
> + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size += S2_MMU_PER_VCPU;
> }
>
> - for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; !ret && i < num_mmus; i++)
> - ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> -
> - if (ret) {
> - for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i < num_mmus; i++)
> - kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i]);
> -
> - free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array);
> - vcpu->arch.ctxt.vncr_array = NULL;
> -
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size = num_mmus;
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -725,7 +720,7 @@ void kvm_s2_mmu_iterate_by_vmid(struct kvm *kvm, u16 vmid,
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
> continue;
> @@ -767,7 +762,7 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu *lookup_s2_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * if S2 translation is disabled.
> */
> for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (!kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
> continue;
> @@ -806,7 +801,7 @@ static struct kvm_s2_mmu *get_s2_mmu_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> for (i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next;
> i < (kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size + kvm->arch.nested_mmus_next);
> i++) {
> - s2_mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
> + s2_mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i % kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size];
>
> if (atomic_read(&s2_mmu->refcnt) == 0)
> break;
> @@ -1223,7 +1218,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_wp(struct kvm *kvm)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
> kvm_stage2_wp_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
> @@ -1242,7 +1237,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_unmap(struct kvm *kvm, bool may_block)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
> kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu), may_block);
> @@ -1261,7 +1256,7 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
> kvm_stage2_flush_range(mmu, 0, kvm_phys_size(mmu));
> @@ -1270,13 +1265,14 @@ void kvm_nested_s2_flush(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++) {
> - struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
> + for (int i = kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
>
> if (!WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mmu->refcnt)))
> kvm_free_stage2_pgd(mmu);
> +
> + if ((i % S2_MMU_PER_VCPU) == 0)
> + kvfree(mmu);
> }
> kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
> kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 22:44 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-03 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a nested S2 MMU realloc test Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04 14:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-04 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-08-04 21:54 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-05 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-05 21:39 ` Karl Mehltretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86jyq6aq8g.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=grayhat@foxmail.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox