The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org,
	grayhat@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:39:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ecgdaupe.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I'd rather keep it on the VM creation path. This is VM-wide data, by
> definition, and given that its size doesn't depend on the number of
> vcpus anymore (we allocate the maximum once and for all), it is right
> where it belongs. See the untested hack below for the freeing on error.

I'll send a v2 with this soon.

> 
> > There's another issue in the current code: the ptdump debugfs file
> > keeps the raw mmu pointer as its private data. I would add that to the
> > commit message.
> 
> Why is that a problem? With this approach, the mmu pointers are always
> expected to be valid, irrespective of the allocation pattern, and we
> only publish pointers to the dumper when the S2_mmu is actively being
> used.
> 

Sorry I was talking about the old implementation. Array reallocation
leaves ptdump i_private pointers dangling.

I'm dropping the selftest for v2. It was a useful KASAN trigger, but is 
not a good fit for the current suite.

Thanks,
Karl

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 22:44 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-03 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a nested S2 MMU realloc test Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04 14:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-04 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 14:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 21:54     ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-05  7:32       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-05 21:39         ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com \
    --to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=grayhat@foxmail.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox