From: "Bjørn Mork" <bmork@dod.no>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resume from swsusp stopped working with 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:57:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871x19giuw.fsf@obelix.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200511220026.55589.dtor_core@ameritech.net
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> writes:
> Swsusp: do not time-out when stopping tasks while resuming
>
> When stopping tasks during esume process there is no point of
> eastablishing a timeout because teh process is past the point
> of no return; there is no possible recovery from failure. If
> stopping tasks fails resume is aborted and user is forced to
> do fsck anyway.
If a clueless users voice counts for anything: I couldn't agree more.
A failed resume is a near catastrophy if you use and trust swsusp. And
how could it ever be useful if you don't?
I would much prefer a very long (indefinite) timeout, and to manually
have to force a reboot without resume. This is an absolutely last
resort and there is no need whatsoever to automatically go there.
Maybe that even would give me a chance to fix some hardware problem
causing the timeout, and then retry the resume.
Please do everything possible to ensure that a resume will never fail
unnecessarily. I can't see how some arbitrary timeout could be
necessary.
Just my 2 øre.
Bjørn
--
Cardboard cut-outs are fun, huh? So, a short man ain't got nothing in
the world these days?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-12 13:39 Resume from swsusp stopped working with 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1 Bjørn Mork
2005-11-12 15:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-12 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-12 20:39 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-13 1:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-13 10:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-17 21:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-18 9:37 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-18 11:40 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 11:49 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-18 18:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 23:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-19 23:48 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 5:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 8:57 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2005-11-22 17:46 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 18:41 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-22 18:53 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 18:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 19:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 20:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-22 22:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 10:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-23 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 13:14 ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-23 13:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 10:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-18 13:46 ` Bernd Donner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-13 3:08 Bernd Donner
2005-11-13 12:13 ` Jacek Kawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871x19giuw.fsf@obelix.mork.no \
--to=bmork@dod.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox