public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bjørn Mork" <bmork@dod.no>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: Resume from swsusp stopped working with 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:09:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hda3d6b8.fsf@obelix.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051122225120.GI1748@elf.ucw.cz> (Pavel Machek's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:51:20 +0100")

Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> writes:

>> > Well, I do not think this problem will surface again. It is first
>> > failure in pretty long time. If it happens again, I'll take your
>> > patch.
>> 
>> If so, could you please make it printk() a message after the timeout has
>> passed?  This way the user will know what's going on at least.
>
> We do have messages there, they even tell you name of process that was
> not stopped. That's enough to debug failure quickly.

I don't think so.  The example said

 "Strange, kseriod not stopped"

This names a process that admittedly took a long time to stop, but not
the real *cause* of the failure.  There was nothing wrong with kseriod.

FWIW, debugging this was way out of my league.  I might have had a
better chance if it mentioned a short, fixed timeout.  I also noticed
that it wasn't very obvious to you either at first.  The first thought
was a failing serio driver, although that admittedly might be because
I mislead you in my attempt to pinpoint the failure.

But my first post in this thread *did* include the printk() you
mention above, so it should have been possible to debug it quickly...


Bjørn

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-23 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-12 13:39 Resume from swsusp stopped working with 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1 Bjørn Mork
2005-11-12 15:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-12 20:01   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-12 20:39   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-13  1:53     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-13 10:09       ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-17 21:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-18  9:37   ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-18 11:40   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 11:49     ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-18 18:31       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 23:32         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-19 23:48           ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22  5:26             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22  8:57               ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-22 17:46                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 18:41                   ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-22 18:53                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 18:45                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 18:59                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 19:08                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 20:37                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 18:47               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 22:15                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-22 22:51                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 10:09                     ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2005-11-23 12:01                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 13:14                         ` Bjørn Mork
2005-11-23 13:25                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 10:53                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-18 13:46   ` Bernd Donner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-13  3:08 Bernd Donner
2005-11-13 12:13 ` Jacek Kawa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hda3d6b8.fsf@obelix.mork.no \
    --to=bmork@dod.no \
    --cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox