From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com>, <chen.yu@linux.dev>,
Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:46:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87255829-a70d-4b64-9fd7-9771677d1933@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8adfc6ddb622229d1a7000980f83a6763427d99.1782866200.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Hi Chenyu,
On 7/1/26 6:46 AM, Chen Yu wrote:
> The CMRC (Cache Monitoring Registers for CPU Agents Description)
> sub-table of ERDT describes the MMIO registers used to read
> cache monitoring counters (e.g. LLC occupancy) for an RMD.
Please use the entire line length available (please check all changelogs).
Some context for this request:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250916105447.GCaMlB976WLxHHeNMD@fat_crate.local/
>
> Parse each CMRC sub-table, ioremap its register window, and save
> the CMRC pointer in the corresponding ERDT domain entry so that
> later monitoring code can read the counters via MMIO.
Is the "save the CMRC pointer ..." referring to how resctrl makes
a copy of the CMRC table? If so, that is very different from
"saving a pointer".
>
> Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v4->v5:
> No change.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> index 6c1df7e43eab..a5754d64fcc1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/erdt.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(domain_info_list);
> static bool __erdt_enabled;
>
> #define ERDT_VALID_VERSION 1
> +#define CMRC_SUPPORTED_INDEX_FN 1
> #define RMDD_FLAG_CPU_L3_DOMAIN BIT(0)
>
> /* Bitmask of valid sub-tables found in the first RMDD, used to ensure all RMDDs match. */
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ static void cleanup_one_domain(struct erdt_domain_info *d)
> {
> erdt_iounmap_domain(d);
> free_cpumask_var(d->cpu_mask);
> + kfree(d->cmrc);
> kfree(d);
> }
>
> @@ -112,6 +114,41 @@ static __init int cacd_init(struct acpi_subtbl_hdr_16 *subtbl,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static __init int cmrc_init(struct acpi_subtbl_hdr_16 *subtbl,
> + struct erdt_domain_info *domain_info)
> +{
> + struct acpi_erdt_cmrc *cmrc = (struct acpi_erdt_cmrc *)subtbl;
> +
> + if (subtbl->length < sizeof(*cmrc)) {
I think it will be helpful if the ERDT parsing code uses consistent patterns. Here,
for example, now that a pointer of accurate type is available via cmrc, can cmrc
be referenced instead to be consistent with cacd_init()?
> + pr_warn(FW_BUG "Truncated CMRC subtable\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (cmrc->index_fn != CMRC_SUPPORTED_INDEX_FN) {
> + pr_info("Unsupported CMRC index function %d\n", cmrc->index_fn);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (!cmrc->clump_size) {
> + pr_warn(FW_BUG "CMRC clump_size is zero\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + domain_info->base[ERDT_MMIO_CMRC_BASE] =
> + erdt_ioremap(cmrc->cmt_reg_base, cmrc->cmt_reg_size, "CMRC base");
> + if (!domain_info->base[ERDT_MMIO_CMRC_BASE])
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + domain_info->cmrc = kmemdup(cmrc, subtbl->length, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!domain_info->cmrc) {
> + iounmap(domain_info->base[ERDT_MMIO_CMRC_BASE]);
> + domain_info->base[ERDT_MMIO_CMRC_BASE] = NULL;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct acpi_subtbl_hdr_16 *rmdd_subtbl(struct acpi_erdt_rmdd *rmdd)
> {
> return (void *)rmdd + sizeof(*rmdd);
> @@ -178,6 +215,13 @@ static __init bool parse_rmdd_entry(struct acpi_subtbl_hdr_16 *rmdd_hdr)
> goto cleanup;
>
> subtbl_mask |= BIT(ACPI_ERDT_TYPE_CACD);
> + break;
> + case ACPI_ERDT_TYPE_CMRC:
> + /* TBD: Only 1 CMRR per domain is allowed? */
Who are you asking this question to?
> + if (!(subtbl_mask & BIT(ACPI_ERDT_TYPE_CMRC)) &&
> + !cmrc_init(subtbl, domain_info))
> + subtbl_mask |= BIT(ACPI_ERDT_TYPE_CMRC);
> +
> break;
> default:
> break;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 7d9100b7648f..3dab05c38003 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ enum erdt_mmio_type {
>
> struct erdt_domain_info {
> void __iomem *base[ERDT_MMIO_NUM_TYPES];
> + struct acpi_erdt_cmrc *cmrc;
> cpumask_var_t cpu_mask;
> int max_rmid;
> struct list_head list;
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 13:44 [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/topology: Export topo_lookup_cpuid() for resctrl use Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save CACD cpumask for RMDD domains Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86/resctrl: Attach ACPI ERDT information to L3 mon domain on CPU online Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:46 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86/resctrl: Replace "msr" in monitoring data identifiers Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86/resctrl: Introduce helpers to read L3 occupancy via MMIO Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] x86/resctrl: Enable " Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:55 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87255829-a70d-4b64-9fd7-9771677d1933@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox