From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com>, <chen.yu@linux.dev>,
Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] x86/resctrl: Replace "msr" in monitoring data identifiers
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:47:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b05c01b-c313-4b19-8590-9d2eee9ed61a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b1c5784dea02365b27bb81799a76bb7d789149e.1782866200.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Hi Chenyu,
On 7/1/26 6:46 AM, Chen Yu wrote:
> Monitoring counter values are currently obtained via MSR and many
> identifiers involved in processing these values contain "msr"
> as part of their names, for example "prev_msr" and "msr_val".
>
> The ERDT ACPI table describes MMIO registers for monitoring data
> access. Rename "msr"-based identifiers to be interface-agnostic
> to support their upcoming use for MMIO-read values.
Are any of the identifiers renamed by this patch actually used by
the MMIO reading code introduced by this series?
>
> No functional change.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Hongyu Ning <hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 3dab05c38003..6eb0fdea6b63 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ struct erdt_domain_info {
> /**
> * struct arch_mbm_state - values used to compute resctrl_arch_rmid_read()s
> * return value.
> - * @chunks: Total data moved (multiply by rdt_group.mon_scale to get bytes)
> - * @prev_msr: Value of IA32_QM_CTR last time it was read for the RMID used to
> - * find this struct.
> + * @chunks: Total data moved (multiply by rdt_group.mon_scale to get bytes)
One renaming that does seem warranted is mon_scale that is a per-resource value that
currently claims to "cqm counter * mon_scale = occupancy in bytes" but this implementation
does not use it and instead uses a value private to ERDT.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 13:44 [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] x86/topology: Export topo_lookup_cpuid() for resctrl use Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and save CACD cpumask for RMDD domains Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86/resctrl: Attach ACPI ERDT information to L3 mon domain on CPU online Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86/resctrl: Replace "msr" in monitoring data identifiers Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:47 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-07-01 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86/resctrl: Introduce helpers to read L3 occupancy via MMIO Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-07-01 13:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] x86/resctrl: Enable " Chen Yu
2026-07-10 23:55 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b05c01b-c313-4b19-8590-9d2eee9ed61a@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chen.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hongyu.ning@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox