From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com>
Cc: <andy@infradead.org>, <dvhart@infradead.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "platform/x86: wmi: Destroy on cleanup rather than unregister"
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:38:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blt45eew.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115052710.46880-1-yongxin.liu@windriver.com> (Yongxin Liu's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:27:10 +0800")
Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com> writes:
> This reverts commit 7b11e8989618581bc0226ad313264cdc05d48d86.
>
> Consider the following hardware setting.
>
> |-PNP0C14:00
> | |-- device #1
> |-PNP0C14:01
> | |-- device #2
>
> When unloading wmi driver module, device #2 will be first unregistered.
> But device_destroy() using MKDEV(0, 0) will locate PNP0C14:00 first
> and unregister it. This is incorrect. Should use device_unregister() to
> unregister the real parent device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu <yongxin.liu@windriver.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index 59e9aa0f9643..e16f660aa117 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static int acpi_wmi_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> acpi_remove_address_space_handler(acpi_device->handle,
> ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC, &acpi_wmi_ec_space_handler);
> wmi_free_devices(acpi_device);
> - device_destroy(&wmi_bus_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
> + device_unregister((struct device *)dev_get_drvdata(&device->dev));
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static int acpi_wmi_probe(struct platform_device *device)
> return 0;
>
> err_remove_busdev:
> - device_destroy(&wmi_bus_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
> + device_unregister(wmi_bus_dev);
>
> err_remove_notify_handler:
> acpi_remove_notify_handler(acpi_device->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
Definitely! Good catch!
device_create() will allow registering multiple devices with a zero
major. Using device_destroy() with MKDEV(0, 0) will unregister an
arbitrary one of them.
I believe all of these should be reviewed and fixed up:
drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c: device_destroy(nvmf_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.c: device_destroy(nvmf_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c: device_destroy(&fc_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c: device_destroy(&fc_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c: device_destroy(fcloop_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c: device_destroy(&wmi_bus_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c: device_destroy(&wmi_bus_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/comedi_test.c: device_destroy(ctcls, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/comedi_test.c: device_destroy(ctcls, MKDEV(0, 0));
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbcon.c: device_destroy(fb_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
net/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.c: device_destroy(idletimer_tg_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
net/netfilter/xt_IDLETIMER.c: device_destroy(idletimer_tg_class, MKDEV(0, 0));
Note that most of these probably are not bugs. yet...
But there is no reason to look up the device by dev_t for drivers
allowing only one device anyway. Using device_unregister() directly
makes the code easier to follow and prevents future bugs in case
someone decides to support more devices.
Maybe we should add a WARN_ON(!MAJOR(devt)) or similar to
device_destroy() to prevent similar future problems?
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 5:27 [PATCH] Revert "platform/x86: wmi: Destroy on cleanup rather than unregister" Yongxin Liu
2019-11-22 1:39 ` Liu, Yongxin
2019-11-22 11:38 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2019-11-22 12:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2020-10-27 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87blt45eew.fsf@miraculix.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yongxin.liu@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox