* [PATCH resend] selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: Adapt progress to kselftest framework
@ 2024-02-15 13:28 Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-02-19 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-02-15 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Stultz, Thomas Gleixner, Stephen Boyd, Shuah Khan,
Wolfram Sang, Niklas Söderlund
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Geert Uytterhoeven
When adapting the test to the kselftest framework, a few printf() calls
indicating test progress were not updated.
Fix this by replacing these printf() calls by ksft_print_msg() calls.
Fixes: ce7d101750ff8450 ("selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: adapt to kselftest framework")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
When just running the test, the output looks like:
# Validating clocksource arch_sys_counter
TAP version 13
1..12
ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
...
# Validating clocksource ffca0000.timer
TAP version 13
1..12
ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
...
When redirecting the test output to a file, the progress prints are not
interspersed with the test output, but collated at the end:
TAP version 13
1..12
ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
...
TAP version 13
1..12
ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
...
# Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:6 error:0
# Validating clocksource arch_sys_counter
# Validating clocksource ffca0000.timer
...
This makes it hard to match the test results with the timer under test.
Is there a way to fix this? The test does use fork().
Thanks!
---
tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
index c5264594064c8516..83faa4e354e389c2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Check everything is sane before we start switching asynchronously */
if (do_sanity_check) {
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- printf("Validating clocksource %s\n",
- clocksource_list[i]);
+ ksft_print_msg("Validating clocksource %s\n",
+ clocksource_list[i]);
if (change_clocksource(clocksource_list[i])) {
status = -1;
goto out;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
- printf("Running Asynchronous Switching Tests...\n");
+ ksft_print_msg("Running Asynchronous Switching Tests...\n");
pid = fork();
if (!pid)
return run_tests(runtime);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH resend] selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: Adapt progress to kselftest framework
2024-02-15 13:28 [PATCH resend] selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: Adapt progress to kselftest framework Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2024-02-19 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2024-02-19 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven, John Stultz, Stephen Boyd, Shuah Khan,
Wolfram Sang, Niklas Söderlund
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Feb 15 2024 at 14:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When adapting the test to the kselftest framework, a few printf() calls
> indicating test progress were not updated.
>
> Fix this by replacing these printf() calls by ksft_print_msg() calls.
>
> Fixes: ce7d101750ff8450 ("selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: adapt to kselftest framework")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-19 11:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-15 13:28 [PATCH resend] selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: Adapt progress to kselftest framework Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-02-19 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox