From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, tony.luck@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arch/x86/mm: Refactor cond_ibpb() to support other use cases
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgh2l0q4.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408090229.16467-4-sblbir@amazon.com>
Balbir Singh <sblbir@amazon.com> writes:
>
> /*
> - * Use bit 0 to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB state into the mm pointer which is
> - * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_ibpb.
> + * Bits to mangle the TIF_SPEC_IB state into the mm pointer which is
> + * stored in cpu_tlb_state.last_user_mm_spec.
> */
> #define LAST_USER_MM_IBPB 0x1UL
> +#define LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK (LAST_USER_MM_IBPB)
>
> /* Reinitialize tlbstate. */
> - this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_ibpb, LAST_USER_MM_IBPB);
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_user_mm_spec, LAST_USER_MM_IBPB);
Shouldn't that be LAST_USER_MM_MASK?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 9:02 [PATCH v3 0/5] Optionally flush L1D on context switch Balbir Singh
2020-04-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arch/x86/kvm: Refactor l1d flush lifecycle management Balbir Singh
2020-04-17 12:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-17 22:34 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arch/x86: Refactor tlbflush and l1d flush Balbir Singh
2020-04-17 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-17 22:58 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arch/x86/mm: Refactor cond_ibpb() to support other use cases Balbir Singh
2020-04-17 13:07 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-04-17 23:02 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-18 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-21 3:46 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-21 9:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arch/x86: Optionally flush L1D on context switch Balbir Singh
2020-04-17 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-18 1:30 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-18 10:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-20 0:24 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-04-08 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arch/x86: Add L1D flushing Documentation Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgh2l0q4.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sblbir@amazon.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox