From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Robert Święcki" <robert@swiecki.net>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Kostya Serebryany" <kcc@google.com>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: allow CLONE_NEWUSER to be disabled
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:41:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpqteh4y.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160128143825.GA17383@www.outflux.net> (Kees Cook's message of "Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:38:25 -0800")
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> There continue to be unexpected security exposures when users have access
> to CLONE_NEWUSER.
So how does this sucessfully address that issue?
> For admins of systems that do not use user namespaces
> and are running distro kernels with CONFIG_USER_NS enabled, there is
> no way to disable CLONE_NEWUSER. This provides a way for sysadmins to
> disable the feature to reduce their attack surface without needing to
> rebuild their kernels.
>
> This is inspired by a similar restriction in Grsecurity, but adds
> a sysctl.
>
I have already nacked this patch. Thank you for removing the broken
capability in sysctl check. But this does not address any of the other
issues I have raised.
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Further as far as I can tell this is just about a witch hunt. Isn't
that what you call a campaign against something when the complaining
party does not understand something persecutes it and does not bother to
try and understand?
I have already told you what kind of direction would be acceptable. I
gave concrete suggests and here you are wasting our time with this patch
again.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 14:38 [PATCH v2] sysctl: allow CLONE_NEWUSER to be disabled Kees Cook
2016-01-28 15:28 ` [kernel-hardening] " Serge E. Hallyn
2016-01-28 17:41 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2016-01-28 20:08 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-28 17:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-01-28 19:11 ` Robert Święcki
2016-01-28 20:17 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpqteh4y.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robert@swiecki.net \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox