From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
joel.granados@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
pauld@redhat.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:26:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c4cd66c-9c3f-411a-82df-0130b78e889c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925060605.2659-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
Thanks for the patch!
On 2025/9/25 14:06, lirongqing wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>
> Currently, when hung_task_panic is enabled, kernel will panic immediately
> upon detecting the first hung task. However, some hung tasks are transient
> and the system can recover fully, while others are unrecoverable and
> trigger consecutive hung task reports, and a panic is expected.
The new hung_task_count_to_panic relies on an absolute count, but I
assume the real indicator you're trying to capture is the trend or
rate of increase over a time window (e.g., "panic if count increases
by 5 in 10 minutes").
IMHO, this kind of time-windowed, trend-based logic seems much more
flexible and better suited for a userspace monitoring agent :)
In other words, why is this the right place for this feature?
Please sell it to us ;)
Lance
>
> This commit adds a new sysctl parameter hung_task_count_to_panic to allows
> specifying the number of consecutive hung tasks that must be detected
> before triggering a kernel panic. This provides finer control for
> environments where transient hangs maybe happen but persistent hangs should
> still be fatal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst | 6 ++++++
> kernel/hung_task.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> index 8b49eab..4240e7b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@ This file shows up if ``CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK`` is enabled.
> 1 Panic immediately.
> = =================================================
>
> +hung_task_count_to_panic
> +=====================
> +
> +When set to a non-zero value, after the number of consecutive hung task
> +occur, the kernel will triggers a panic
> +
>
> hung_task_check_count
> =====================
> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
> index 8708a12..87a6421 100644
> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace;
> static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_panic =
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC);
>
> +static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic;
> +
> static int
> hung_task_panic(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
> {
> @@ -219,7 +221,9 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
>
> trace_sched_process_hang(t);
>
> - if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) {
> + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic ||
> + (sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic &&
> + (sysctl_hung_task_detect_count >= sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic))) {
> console_verbose();
> hung_task_show_lock = true;
> hung_task_call_panic = true;
> @@ -388,6 +392,14 @@ static const struct ctl_table hung_task_sysctls[] = {
> .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> },
> {
> + .procname = "hung_task_count_to_panic",
> + .data = &sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> + },
> + {
> .procname = "hung_task_check_count",
> .data = &sysctl_hung_task_check_count,
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 6:06 [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks lirongqing
2025-09-25 7:37 ` Hillf Danton
2025-09-25 8:03 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-25 10:26 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-09-26 18:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-27 2:18 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-28 1:51 ` [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-27 2:39 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-28 1:54 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28 3:19 ` Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28 3:29 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c4cd66c-9c3f-411a-82df-0130b78e889c@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox