From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
joel.granados@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
pauld@redhat.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:18:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7f06bf6-a17a-48b4-8dfa-308ad4c5c500@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81514e1d-4a10-4466-8a87-2d4b0927195b@paulmck-laptop>
On 2025/9/27 02:02, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 06:26:00PM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the patch!
>>
>> On 2025/9/25 14:06, lirongqing wrote:
>>> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, when hung_task_panic is enabled, kernel will panic immediately
>>> upon detecting the first hung task. However, some hung tasks are transient
>>> and the system can recover fully, while others are unrecoverable and
>>> trigger consecutive hung task reports, and a panic is expected.
>>
>> The new hung_task_count_to_panic relies on an absolute count, but I
>> assume the real indicator you're trying to capture is the trend or
>> rate of increase over a time window (e.g., "panic if count increases
>> by 5 in 10 minutes").
>>
>> IMHO, this kind of time-windowed, trend-based logic seems much more
>> flexible and better suited for a userspace monitoring agent :)
>>
>> In other words, why is this the right place for this feature?
>
> A possibly related question is "why are RCU CPU stall warnings implemented
> in the kernel instead of in userspace?" One reason is that by the
Fair point. I was initially leaning towards the "let userspace
handle it" camp ...
> time that things get bad enough to trigger an RCU CPU stall warning,
> userspace might not be capable of doing much of anything. Thus, there
> is an uncomfortably high probability that orchestrating RCU CPU stall
> warnings from userspace would cause these warnings to be lost entirely.
But you're right. When things really go sideways, userspace is likely
dead in the water.
>
> Similar reasoning might (or might not) apply to the hung-task mechanism.
Yes. No objection from me ;)
Thanks,
Lance
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> Please sell it to us ;)
>> Lance
>>
>>>
>>> This commit adds a new sysctl parameter hung_task_count_to_panic to allows
>>> specifying the number of consecutive hung tasks that must be detected
>>> before triggering a kernel panic. This provides finer control for
>>> environments where transient hangs maybe happen but persistent hangs should
>>> still be fatal.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst | 6 ++++++
>>> kernel/hung_task.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> index 8b49eab..4240e7b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@ This file shows up if ``CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK`` is enabled.
>>> 1 Panic immediately.
>>> = =================================================
>>> +hung_task_count_to_panic
>>> +=====================
>>> +
>>> +When set to a non-zero value, after the number of consecutive hung task
>>> +occur, the kernel will triggers a panic
>>> +
>>> hung_task_check_count
>>> =====================
>>> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> index 8708a12..87a6421 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace;
>>> static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_panic =
>>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC);
>>> +static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic;
>>> +
>>> static int
>>> hung_task_panic(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
>>> {
>>> @@ -219,7 +221,9 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
>>> trace_sched_process_hang(t);
>>> - if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) {
>>> + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic ||
>>> + (sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic &&
>>> + (sysctl_hung_task_detect_count >= sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic))) {
>>> console_verbose();
>>> hung_task_show_lock = true;
>>> hung_task_call_panic = true;
>>> @@ -388,6 +392,14 @@ static const struct ctl_table hung_task_sysctls[] = {
>>> .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
>>> },
>>> {
>>> + .procname = "hung_task_count_to_panic",
>>> + .data = &sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic,
>>> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
>>> + .mode = 0644,
>>> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
>>> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
>>> + },
>>> + {
>>> .procname = "hung_task_check_count",
>>> .data = &sysctl_hung_task_check_count,
>>> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-27 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 6:06 [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks lirongqing
2025-09-25 7:37 ` Hillf Danton
2025-09-25 8:03 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-25 10:26 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-26 18:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-27 2:18 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-09-28 1:51 ` [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-27 2:39 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-28 1:54 ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28 3:19 ` Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28 3:29 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7f06bf6-a17a-48b4-8dfa-308ad4c5c500@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox