public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com,
	joel.granados@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	pauld@redhat.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:18:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7f06bf6-a17a-48b4-8dfa-308ad4c5c500@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81514e1d-4a10-4466-8a87-2d4b0927195b@paulmck-laptop>



On 2025/9/27 02:02, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 06:26:00PM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the patch!
>>
>> On 2025/9/25 14:06, lirongqing wrote:
>>> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, when hung_task_panic is enabled, kernel will panic immediately
>>> upon detecting the first hung task. However, some hung tasks are transient
>>> and the system can recover fully, while others are unrecoverable and
>>> trigger consecutive hung task reports, and a panic is expected.
>>
>> The new hung_task_count_to_panic relies on an absolute count, but I
>> assume the real indicator you're trying to capture is the trend or
>> rate of increase over a time window (e.g., "panic if count increases
>> by 5 in 10 minutes").
>>
>> IMHO, this kind of time-windowed, trend-based logic seems much more
>> flexible and better suited for a userspace monitoring agent :)
>>
>> In other words, why is this the right place for this feature?
> 
> A possibly related question is "why are RCU CPU stall warnings implemented
> in the kernel instead of in userspace?"  One reason is that by the

Fair point. I was initially leaning towards the "let userspace
handle it" camp ...

> time that things get bad enough to trigger an RCU CPU stall warning,
> userspace might not be capable of doing much of anything.  Thus, there
> is an uncomfortably high probability that orchestrating RCU CPU stall
> warnings from userspace would cause these warnings to be lost entirely.

But you're right. When things really go sideways, userspace is likely
dead in the water.

> 
> Similar reasoning might (or might not) apply to the hung-task mechanism.

Yes. No objection from me ;)

Thanks,
Lance

> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
>> Please sell it to us ;)
>> Lance
>>
>>>
>>> This commit adds a new sysctl parameter hung_task_count_to_panic to allows
>>> specifying the number of consecutive hung tasks that must be detected
>>> before triggering a kernel panic. This provides finer control for
>>> environments where transient hangs maybe happen but persistent hangs should
>>> still be fatal.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>> ---
>>>    Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst |  6 ++++++
>>>    kernel/hung_task.c                          | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>    2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> index 8b49eab..4240e7b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
>>> @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@ This file shows up if ``CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK`` is enabled.
>>>    1 Panic immediately.
>>>    = =================================================
>>> +hung_task_count_to_panic
>>> +=====================
>>> +
>>> +When set to a non-zero value, after the number of consecutive hung task
>>> +occur, the kernel will triggers a panic
>>> +
>>>    hung_task_check_count
>>>    =====================
>>> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> index 8708a12..87a6421 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
>>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace;
>>>    static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_panic =
>>>    	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC);
>>> +static unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic;
>>> +
>>>    static int
>>>    hung_task_panic(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -219,7 +221,9 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
>>>    	trace_sched_process_hang(t);
>>> -	if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) {
>>> +	if (sysctl_hung_task_panic ||
>>> +	    (sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic &&
>>> +	     (sysctl_hung_task_detect_count >= sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic))) {
>>>    		console_verbose();
>>>    		hung_task_show_lock = true;
>>>    		hung_task_call_panic = true;
>>> @@ -388,6 +392,14 @@ static const struct ctl_table hung_task_sysctls[] = {
>>>    		.extra2		= SYSCTL_ONE,
>>>    	},
>>>    	{
>>> +		.procname	= "hung_task_count_to_panic",
>>> +		.data		= &sysctl_hung_task_count_to_panic,
>>> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
>>> +		.mode		= 0644,
>>> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>>> +		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
>>> +	},
>>> +	{
>>>    		.procname	= "hung_task_check_count",
>>>    		.data		= &sysctl_hung_task_check_count,
>>>    		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-27  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25  6:06 [PATCH] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks lirongqing
2025-09-25  7:37 ` Hillf Danton
2025-09-25  8:03   ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-25 10:26 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-26 18:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-09-27  2:18     ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-09-28  1:51     ` [????] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-27  2:39 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-28  1:54   ` [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28  3:19   ` Li,Rongqing
2025-09-28  3:29     ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7f06bf6-a17a-48b4-8dfa-308ad4c5c500@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox