From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>, hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>,
<kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 5/9] sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:38:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e556a4-59d3-4be4-b4a8-5e7ef4b523d1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030001857.681432-6-jstultz@google.com>
Hello John,
On 10/30/2025 5:48 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> +/*
> + * Only called from __schedule context
> + *
> + * There are some cases where we are going to re-do the action
> + * that added the balance callbacks. We may not be in a state
> + * where we can run them, so just zap them so they can be
> + * properly re-added on the next time around. This is similar
> + * handling to running the callbacks, except we just don't call
> + * them.
> + */
> +static void zap_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + struct balance_callback *next, *head;
> + bool found = false;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +
> + head = rq->balance_callback;
> + while (head) {
> + if (head == &balance_push_callback)
> + found = true;
> + next = head->next;
> + head->next = NULL;
> + head = next;
> + }
> + rq->balance_callback = found ? &balance_push_callback : NULL;
> +}
There is nothing proxy-exec specific in this function. Do we need to
keep it behind CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC?
I believe compiler will optimize out the dead code and having
zap_balance_callbacks() unconditionally shouldn't have make any
difference to the size of generated binary for
!CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC case.
Apart from that nit. feel free to include:
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> +#else
> +static inline void zap_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq) {}
> +#endif
> +
> static void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct balance_callback *head)
> {
> void (*func)(struct rq *rq);
> @@ -6901,10 +6933,15 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(int sched_mode)
> rq_set_donor(rq, next);
> if (unlikely(task_is_blocked(next))) {
> next = find_proxy_task(rq, next, &rf);
> - if (!next)
> + if (!next) {
> + /* zap the balance_callbacks before picking again */
> + zap_balance_callbacks(rq);
> goto pick_again;
> - if (next == rq->idle)
> + }
> + if (next == rq->idle) {
> + zap_balance_callbacks(rq);
Also I would have preferred to have that zap_balance_callbacks() in
proxy_resched_idle() but this is okay too.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
> goto keep_resched;
> + }
> }
> picked:
> clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 0:18 [PATCH v23 0/9] Donor Migration for Proxy Execution (v23) John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 1/9] locking: Add task::blocked_lock to serialize blocked_on state John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 2/9] sched: Fix modifying donor->blocked on without proper locking John Stultz
2025-10-30 4:51 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 23:42 ` John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 3/9] sched/locking: Add special p->blocked_on==PROXY_WAKING value for proxy return-migration John Stultz
2025-10-30 7:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 23:53 ` John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 4/9] sched: Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty helper John Stultz
2025-10-30 7:38 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 5/9] sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again John Stultz
2025-10-30 8:08 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-10-31 3:15 ` John Stultz
2025-10-31 3:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 6/9] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration) John Stultz
2025-10-30 9:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-07 23:18 ` John Stultz
2025-11-10 4:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 1:53 ` John Stultz
2025-11-20 2:00 ` John Stultz
2025-11-20 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 6:33 ` John Stultz
2025-11-20 7:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 7:27 ` John Stultz
2025-11-07 15:19 ` Juri Lelli
2025-11-07 17:24 ` John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 7/9] sched: Have try_to_wake_up() handle return-migration for PROXY_WAKING case John Stultz
2025-10-31 4:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 1:05 ` John Stultz
2025-11-20 3:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 7:34 ` John Stultz
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 8/9] sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs John Stultz
2025-10-31 5:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-11 7:50 ` John Stultz
2025-11-11 8:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 0:18 ` [PATCH v23 9/9] sched: Migrate whole chain in proxy_migrate_task() John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90e556a4-59d3-4be4-b4a8-5e7ef4b523d1@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox