From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel@sberdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@gmail.com>,
<avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND net v4 1/4] virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account credit
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:05:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92bc3587-6994-e003-5ec5-252c1961d8ec@sberdevices.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bfcb7fd-bce3-30cf-8a58-8baa57b7345c@sberdevices.ru>
'skb->len' can vary when we partially read the data, this complicates the
calculation of credit to be updated in 'virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt()/
virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt()'.
Also in 'virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt()' we were miscalculating the
credit since 'skb->len' was redundant.
For these reasons, let's replace the use of skbuff state to calculate new
'rx_bytes'/'fwd_cnt' values with explicit value as input argument. This
makes code more simple, because it is not needed to change skbuff state
before each call to update 'rx_bytes'/'fwd_cnt'.
Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index a1581c77cf84..618680fd9906 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -241,21 +241,18 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
}
static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ u32 len)
{
- if (vvs->rx_bytes + skb->len > vvs->buf_alloc)
+ if (vvs->rx_bytes + len > vvs->buf_alloc)
return false;
- vvs->rx_bytes += skb->len;
+ vvs->rx_bytes += len;
return true;
}
static void virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ u32 len)
{
- int len;
-
- len = skb_headroom(skb) - sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr) - skb->len;
vvs->rx_bytes -= len;
vvs->fwd_cnt += len;
}
@@ -388,7 +385,9 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
skb_pull(skb, bytes);
if (skb->len == 0) {
- virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ u32 pkt_len = le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len);
+
+ virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len);
consume_skb(skb);
} else {
__skb_queue_head(&vvs->rx_queue, skb);
@@ -437,17 +436,17 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
while (!msg_ready) {
struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
+ size_t pkt_len;
skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
if (!skb)
break;
hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
+ pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
- size_t pkt_len;
size_t bytes_to_copy;
- pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
if (bytes_to_copy) {
@@ -484,7 +483,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
}
- virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len);
kfree_skb(skb);
}
@@ -1040,7 +1039,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
- can_enqueue = virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ can_enqueue = virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, len);
if (!can_enqueue) {
free_pkt = true;
goto out;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 11:03 [PATCH RESEND net v4 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-14 11:05 ` Arseniy Krasnov [this message]
2023-03-08 15:11 ` [PATCH RESEND net v4 1/4] virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account credit Bobby Eshleman
2023-03-14 11:06 ` [PATCH RESEND net v4 2/4] virtio/vsock: remove redundant 'skb_pull()' call Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-08 15:15 ` Bobby Eshleman
2023-03-14 11:08 ` [PATCH RESEND net v4 3/4] virtio/vsock: don't drop skbuff on copy failure Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-08 15:16 ` Bobby Eshleman
2023-03-14 11:09 ` [PATCH RESEND net v4 4/4] test/vsock: copy to user failure test Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-16 17:30 ` [PATCH RESEND net v4 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92bc3587-6994-e003-5ec5-252c1961d8ec@sberdevices.ru \
--to=avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox